Revolution Now!

By: Isaiah P. Kamatstein 


We need to study the old Jewish Labour Bund and the original Black Panther party if we are to succeed at overthrowing Zionism.

But as I see with both Black eyes and Jewish eyes.
I must warn everyone that the Liberalism by today's Young Blacks creates a disconnect between Blacks and the Third World. The Liberalism of European Jewry during the Civil Rights movement has a lot to do with why and how the Black Panther party got destroyed by COINTELPRO. It is good that the European Jewry stood with Martin Luther King Jr. and yet it needs to be asked why European Jewry did not stand with Malcolm X the same way and praise his criticisms of Zionism? Why couldn't European Jewry start the Bundist Movement back when the Black Panthers started a Rainbow Coalition? Obviously the European Jewish Ultra-Orthodox are not political, so it is not to them that I am addressing these questions. Fred Hampton was the greatest Black Panther who ever lived he started the Rainbow Coalition which in Bundist words would be called a United Front. The Rainbow Coalition was a coalition active in the late 1960s and early 1970s, founded in Chicago, Illinois by Fred Hampton of the revolutionary Black Panther party, along with William "Preacherman" Fesperman, Jack (Junebug) Boykin, Bobby Joe Mcginnis and Hy Thurman of the Young Patriots Organization and the founder of the Young Lords as a civil and human rights movement Jose Cha Cha Jimenez. It later expanded to include various ethnic socialist groups and community groups like the Lincoln Park Poor People's Coalition. It was associated with the rising Black Power movement. Had there been a Bundist Movement back then to join such a (United Front) Rainbow Coalition the ideology of Zionism and the State of Israel would not have existed anymore, Jewish Blacks could have united with Jewish Africans and Jewish Europeans and this would have dispelled the fictions of Jewish ethnicity. Such a Bundist Movement could have helped the Black Panthers understand that they were practicing National-Cultural Autonomy. In those days America was prideful of World War II and that could have been used to expose COINTELPRO with out it leaking or even needing to be declassified. We need a United Front today and we need to model it after the Rainbow Coalition. We should not use the words Rainbow Coalition because several Liberals call their alliances this.

January 28, 2019 Amber goes to work.
She leaves after a 5:30 p.m. meeting.
She tells her coworkers that she is not feeling well.
6:30 p.m. Amber Evans goes to a local store where she buys cold medicine and a Snickers bar.
The store’s security footage shows Amber leaving the store, she is missing for several days.
Her dead body is found in an Ohio River on March 25, 2019.

Black people need to do what the original Black Panther party did, bear arms and ditch nonviolence, any one of us in the Bundist Movement could be murdered in the same way that she was, but this will be harder to do when we have more arms and bigger press, sadly this is dependent on us not getting censored, this is an uphill battle.

Let us start Revolution NOW! 
To start it let revolutionize ourselves, we start by investigating how to Combat Liberalism.

COMBAT LIBERALISM: September 7, 1937 - By Mao Tse-tung.

We stand for active ideological struggle because it is the weapon for ensuring unity within the Party and the revolutionary organizations in the interest of our fight. Every Communist and revolutionary should take up this weapon. But liberalism rejects ideological struggle and stands for unprincipled peace, thus giving rise to a decadent, Philistine attitude and bringing about political degeneration in certain units and individuals in the Party and the revolutionary organizations. Liberalism manifests itself in various ways.

To let things slide for the sake of peace and friendship when a person has clearly gone wrong, and refrain from principled argument because he is an old acquaintance, a fellow townsman, a schoolmate, a close friend, a loved one, an old colleague or old subordinate. Or to touch on the matter lightly instead of going into it thoroughly, so as to keep on good terms. The result is that both the organization and the individual are harmed. This is one type of liberalism. 

To indulge in irresponsible criticism in private instead of actively putting forward one's suggestions to the organization. To say nothing to people to their faces but to gossip behind their backs, or to say nothing at a meeting but to gossip afterwards. To show no regard at all for the principles of collective life but to follow one's own inclination. This is a second type. 

To let things drift if they do not affect one personally; to say as little as possible while knowing perfectly well what is wrong, to be worldly wise and play safe and seek only to avoid blame. This is a third type. 

Not to obey orders but to give pride of place to one's own opinions. To demand special consideration from the organization but to reject its discipline. This is a fourth type. 

To indulge in personal attacks, pick quarrels, vent personal spite or seek revenge instead of entering into an argument and struggling against incorrect views for the sake of unity or progress or getting the work done properly. This is a fifth type. 

To hear incorrect views without rebutting them and even to hear counter-revolutionary remarks without reporting them, but instead to take them calmly as if nothing had happened. This is a sixth type. 

To be among the masses and fail to conduct propaganda and agitation or speak at meetings or conduct investigations and inquiries among them, and instead to be indifferent to them and show no concern for their well-being, forgetting that one is a Communist and behaving as if one were an ordinary non-Communist. This is a seventh type. 

To see someone harming the interests of the masses and yet not feel indignant, or dissuade or stop him or reason with him, but to allow him to continue. This is an eighth type. 

To work half-heartedly without a definite plan or direction; to work perfunctorily and muddle along--"So long as one remains a monk, one goes on tolling the bell." This is a ninth type. 

To regard oneself as having rendered great service to the revolution, to pride oneself on being a veteran, to disdain minor assignments while being quite unequal to major tasks, to be slipshod in work and slack in study. This is a tenth type. 

To be aware of one's own mistakes and yet make no attempt to correct them, taking a liberal attitude towards oneself. This is an eleventh type. 

We could name more. But these eleven are the principal types.
They are all manifestations of liberalism.
Liberalism is extremely harmful in a revolutionary collective. It is a corrosive which eats away unity, undermines cohesion, causes apathy and creates dissension. It robs the revolutionary ranks of compact organization and strict discipline, prevents policies from being carried through and alienates the Party organizations from the masses which the Party leads. It is an extremely bad tendency.
Liberalism stems from petty-bourgeois selfishness, it places personal interests first and the interests of the revolution second, and this gives rise to ideological, political and organizational liberalism.
People who are liberals look upon the principles of Marxism as abstract dogma. They approve of Marxism, but are not prepared to practice it or to practice it in full; they are not prepared to replace their liberalism by Marxism. These people have their Marxism, but they have their liberalism as well--they talk Marxism but practice liberalism; they apply Marxism to others but liberalism to themselves. They keep both kinds of goods in stock and find a use for each. This is how the minds of certain people work.
Liberalism is a manifestation of opportunism and conflicts fundamentally with Marxism. It is negative and objectively has the effect of helping the enemy; that is why the enemy welcomes its preservation in our midst. Such being its nature, there should be no place for it in the ranks of the revolution.
We must use Marxism, which is positive in spirit, to overcome liberalism, which is negative. A Communist should have largeness of mind and he should be staunch and active, looking upon the interests of the revolution as his very life and subordinating his personal interests to those of the revolution; always and everywhere he should adhere to principle and wage a tireless struggle against all incorrect ideas and actions, so as to consolidate the collective life of the Party and strengthen the ties between the Party and the masses; he should be more concerned about the Party and the masses than about any private person, and more concerned about others than about himself. Only thus can he be considered a Communist.
All loyal, honest, active and upright Communists must unite to oppose the liberal tendencies shown by certain people among us, and set them on the right path. This is one of the tasks on our ideological front. 

 Next I explain who and what is the Bund Council Staff.

The Bund Council Staff consists of:

MYSELF: Isaiah P. Kamatstein – Councilman of Committees
Uri Adiah – Councilman of National Affairs
Miriam Emesberg – Councilwoman of Education
Hannah Toff – Councilwoman of Strategic Projects
Marvin Eliyahu – Councilman of World Forums

MYSELF the Councilman of Committees -
The purpose of the Councilman of Committees is to form political committees between the Bundist Movement and larger groups that are necessary yet hard to achieve in dialogue and relations. Now our context of committee an alliance congress between the Bundist Movement and such a group, usually in the context of religion and non-national gatherings.
The main Committees I work to form are;
LGBT Committee.
Catholic Church Committee.
Muslim Committee.
Orthodox Church Committee.
New Community Mafia Committee.

Uri Adiah the Councilman of National Affairs -
There are two purposes of the Councilman of National Affairs.
The first is to form strong ties between the Jewish Nation and other Nationalities. The second is to evaluate the National information based on the material conditions accordingly both peoplehood and geopolitical factors.

Miriam Emesberg the Councilwoman of Education -
The purpose of the Councilwoman of Education is to provide Jewish education in both academic and mythological terms to the Jewish Vanguard, always in a cultural context sometimes in a religious context. The Councilwoman of Education is to safeguard the Jewish Community from Modernist Secular Conformity. The Councilwoman of Education is to dispel right-wing propaganda, leftist populist deception, centrist liberalism, euroeccentric historical revisionism prevalent in Capitalist, Communist, and Fascist doctrines. It is also the duty of the Councilwoman of Education to be educated in the matters of Civil Rights struggles, revolutionary struggles, and reformation movements and then teach it to the Vanguard so that this is passed on to the broader Jewish Community.

Hannah Toff the Councilwoman of Strategic Projects -
The purpose of the Councilwoman of Strategic Projects is to find the correct strategies needed for legal deterrence against hostile police forces. She must have a knowledge of weapons, and law in the use of those weapons.

Marvin Eliyahu the Councilman of World Forums -
The purpose of the Councilman of World Forums is to literally start World Forums, this is the most non-religious office within the entire
Bund Council Staff, the matter of World Forums deals with Countries, Territories, and World Political Organizations, not Nations. But sometimes Nations have Countries so the office of World Forums does work in close connection to the office of National Affairs. 

Criticism first; on MYSELF the Councilman of Committees.
It took me to long to approach these issues, and I hope that we will not waste to much time anymore. I saw issues and I ignored them for a long time.

To let things slide for the sake of peace and friendship when a person has clearly gone wrong, and refrain from principled argument because he is an old acquaintance, a fellow townsman, a schoolmate, a close friend, a loved one, an old colleague or old subordinate. Or to touch on the matter lightly instead of going into it thoroughly, so as to keep on good terms. The result is that both the organization and the individual are harmed. This is one type of liberalism.

I am guilty of Liberalism, and I hope that I have fixed this.
Every time I go along to get along, I harm us all, I fear being accused of arrogance. My fears hold us back, I will work harder to not stray in fear of attack.  I will do my best to not error like this ever again. 

Standing in Defense second; on MYSELF the Councilman of Committees.
I get wrongfully attacked by Anarchists for pointing out their historical failings in reply to them when they make populist propaganda. I do not attack Anarchists nor do I go out of my way to slander them, it is strange that I get attacked for "Pro-Stalinist ideas" I do not call myself Marxist-Leninist, but sure I absorb much of it. Yet many Anarchists will use Black Panthers to justify things to me forgetting that they where not in anyway Anarchist.
We take in Emma Goldman's Syndicalism: the Modern Menace to Capitalism very seriously, so we are not opposed to every Anarchist idea, but Anarchism it self is more historically revisionist than Marxism. As far as Joseph Stalin is concerned he did not deliberately stave people, heat waves and famines have nothing to do with Stalin. I require that Anarchists concern themselves with saving the Community from Police brutality. 

Criticism first; on Uri Adiah the Councilman of National Affairs.
You consistently indulge in gossip, you need to stop that Uri.
Any time there is a rumor about anyone friend or foe you indulge in this gossip. And you consistently have with held your very best ideas from the rest of us.

To indulge in irresponsible criticism in private instead of actively putting forward one's suggestions to the organization. To say nothing to people to their faces but to gossip behind their backs, or to say nothing at a meeting but to gossip afterwards. To show no regard at all for the principles of collective life but to follow one's own inclination. This is a second type.

You are guilty of Liberalism Comrade, fix it.

Standing in Defense second; on Uri Adiah the Councilman of National Affairs.
More people need to listen to on the issues of Syrian and Kurdish conflicts, none of us even dare to get the correct answer, you have taken the correct view and made it clear it is complex and what are the ways out, we need to follow your line on this. 


Criticism first; on Miriam Emesberg the Councilwoman of Education.
You pride yourself on your vast knowledge which you do have it, and you do have this. But you also try to de-secularize everyone forgetting that this is not a religious organization. Strange as you are an Atheist, it is true that an Agnostic or an Atheist may have religiosity. But I get the feeling that you do this as cover for avoiding harder work, not because you are lazy but because you are afraid others will question your prime vast knowledge.

To regard oneself as having rendered great service to the revolution, to pride oneself on being a veteran, to disdain minor assignments while being quite unequal to major tasks, to be slipshod in work and slack in study. This is a tenth type.

Stop shutting us down when we demand a fact check or for you to research something for one of us if we are having trouble understanding a subject or have not the time to study, you are good at study and can outmatch us all so it takes nothing from you.

Standing in Defense second; on Miriam Emesberg the Councilwoman of Education.
Several of us are guilty of ignoring you, we need to stop this.
You honestly would not have the issues you have if you had more solidarity from the rest of us. We have all been busy and that has made things difficult, this is not an excuse and I think we have made it such without admitting it, I am sorry. I will do all I can to end that. 


Criticism first; on Hannah Toff the Councilwoman of Strategic Projects.
You are stubborn hot headed and overly aggressive, if I was younger I would be able to keep up but I'm not so young anymore. You make a lot of rash decisions out of nowhere, you need to think about the revolution and how your actions may cost us and you. 

Not to obey orders but to give pride of place to one's own opinions. To demand special consideration from the organization but to reject its discipline. This is a fourth type.

I need to remind you that the Bund Council Staff must follow the orders of the three higher offices; the Cleric, the Emissary, and the Chairman. 

Standing in Defense second; on Hannah Toff the Councilwoman of Strategic Projects.
Without you, I would be dead, Comrade Net would be dead, Uri would be dead, Dona would also be dead. You are a hero Hannah Toff, you are also rather brilliant. Your strategies and the projects you have designed for strategy are unspeakably better than much of the United States military. 

Criticism first; on Marvin Eliyahu the Councilman of World Forums.
I understand that you and Uri Adiah are best friends and roommates but you don't have to always be so unprofessional, I am referring to your tolerance of Uri's gossiping.

To see someone harming the interests of the masses and yet not feel indignant, or dissuade or stop him or reason with him, but to allow him to continue. This is an eighth type.
I can tell that the gossip bothers you Marvin, so why let it continue, in times like that you may be the only one he will give listening ears.

Standing in Defense second; on Marvin Eliyahu the Councilman of World Forums.
You have become a master at dialectical materialism.
I disowned every member of the Mesa Maoist Network after they refused to engage in dialectics with you, they exposed themselves as typical eurocentric Communists. Everything you said was correct, if they were so correct they should have been able to answer you with a counter but they refused. Sometimes you are just correct and people need to get over it. I was very happy to disown them, even the Black members are inwardly chauvinistic, trust my words on this. 

Now that this is taken care of we need to understand that dialectical materialism in the context of Marxism-Leninism can allow for National-Cultural Autonomy. But this can only be known if you study the correct writings. There is a lot to go through, so let me mention three favorites of mine to start off with.

Capitalism Plus Dope Equals Genocide by Michael Cetewayo Tabor.
The Basis of Black Power by Stokely Carmichael.
Quotations from Mao Tse Tung. 

After reading these it still will be hard to understand how Marxism-Leninism can allow for National-Cultural Autonomy and that is why we are writing a Manifesto. Again, I refuse to call myself a Marxist-Leninist because for me this would be inherently dishonest. Modern Bundism actually falls into the category of Pantherism, I am proud to have helped us bring us to that realization.   

Free the Diaspora with Proletarian Doikeit

By Isaiah Kamatstein 

 I am very fortunate that my Boyfriend's sister had the Money and shared interests for us to take a trip to Venezuela. My Boyfriend and I were able to take Uri Adiah and Marvin Eliyahu with us, so we did. We wanted to take Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua with us but he regrettably could not come with us it is strange to see the place is exactly how he said it would be. When we got back to America we were intercepted by U.S Intel and each of us were forced to sign a statement not to talk about much of the things we saw, we also had to sign a statement not mentioning which part of U.S Intel intercepted us upon our return to America. All of our pictures confiscated and all of our visual and audio recordings were erased, my Boyfriend is going to be pressing charges so maybe we can at least get the pictures back. I know what I can and can not say about Venezuela so I will keep it brief. Seeing how much the indigenous of Venezuela support Nicolás Maduro, and then coming back to America to see how much no one cares about them yet can care enough to support Juan Guaidó who only represents the colonial spanish Oligarchy along side their U.S Imperialist masters exposes White Privilege as being the blood of Capitalism. Venezuela has nothing to sell to the Global economy except for Oil, all the money goes to the  indigenous and mixed Peoples of Venezuela. America wishes to get that Venezuelan Oil cheaper with the help of Juan Guaidó. I think the strangest thing in Venezuela is that they have very Corporatized media, all the channels say bad things about Nicolás Maduro except for the Government channel.

The Jewish Nation is based on Culture and Religion.
The Black Nation is based on Culture and Ethnicity.

Not every Culture constitutes a Nation, however every Nation constitutes a Culture. This is necessary to say when explaining the Black Jewish connection. I'm not half Black because I struggle with the Black People just as much as did my father. I'm not half Jewish because there is no such thing. I am a Jewish Black. No person can hold two religions at the same time, any other such claims to the contrary are colonial. My father was a Black man, my mother is an Ashkenazi woman and she was born of a Jewish mother and passed it to me as is the cultural criteria for being raised Jewish. My father was a Jewish Black, there was no contradiction to that because Blackness is not dependent on religiosity, Jewishness is dependent on religiosity. Another factor is that religiosity is is not exclusive to religious observance.

The origin of Black Nationality started when people from the African Continent were sold to Europeans to work as chattel slaves. This Nation further developed through struggle with the aim of liberation that is still ongoing. But there is no White Nation, Whites can trace their lineage back to Europe without going to ancestry.com the same can not be said for Blacks. Europeans are born European but they are not born White, my mother may be European but that can never make me white as I do not benefit from Whiteness, ethnically I am half European and half African, but I am not an African in any sense of connection to African Nationality because Black Nationality stands apart. Not all Europeans are indoctrinated to be White and it is possible to shake off Whiteness.  It is possible for someone to have both African and Black Nationality, this is the case for Black South Africans, it is also the case for someone who has a Black parent and a North Afro-Arab parent. When an Arab Egyptian becomes a Citizen of the United States of America that person is by definition an African American and although such a person will encounter racism from Whites and possibly even Islamophobia that person will not have Black struggle that struggle will be Arab. The revolutionary Black Panther party were the political descendants of Malcolm X, founded by Huey P. Newton and Bobby Seale. Huey P. Newton brought Marxism-Leninism into the Black Panther party and this would evolve the foundation of today what we know as Pantherism. Huey P. Newton was neutralized and through drugs and COINTELPRO, but this does not discredit Pantherism, nor does this discredit the work and writings that Huey P. Newton laboured. The problem at hand has to do with turning Black forefathers into Black idols. Malcolm X, Huey P. Newton, and Bobby Seale are pillars to Blackness but they are not infallible saints, their mistakes do not reflect ideology. Blackness is not Afrocentric because, firstly because afrocentricity does not exist and secondly because Black Nationality is separate from African Culture, although still very much related and rooted to such.

The origin of Jewish Nationality was when Moses was handed the Torah on Mount Sinai, and it hardly matters as to whether or not this is a mere story because the Torah Culture is the foundation to Jewishness. Even the most non observant person who is Jewish has Judaism. The Jewish Religion is a Diaspora Religion, and the Jewish Culture is the Torah Culture. Judaism is not a philosophy, the desire for some to define Judaism as a philosophy is rooted in a reaction and/or need to keep colonized Jewish people from straying, this attempt causes even further colonization. National-Cultural Autonomy for the Jewish Nation means freeing the Diaspora from the control of Whiteness. Whiteness is the continuity of Western Christian Dominance.

The first step to freeing the Diaspora is to Combat Liberalism as described by Mao. 

COMBAT LIBERALISM by Mao Tse-tung September 7, 1937

We stand for active ideological struggle because it is the weapon for ensuring unity within the Party and the revolutionary organizations in the interest of our fight. Every Communist and revolutionary should take up this weapon.

But liberalism rejects ideological struggle and stands for unprincipled peace, thus giving rise to a decadent, Philistine attitude and bringing about political degeneration in certain units and individuals in the Party and the revolutionary organizations.
Liberalism manifests itself in various ways. 

To let things slide for the sake of peace and friendship when a person has clearly gone wrong, and refrain from principled argument because he is an old acquaintance, a fellow townsman, a schoolmate, a close friend, a loved one, an old colleague or old subordinate. Or to touch on the matter lightly instead of going into it thoroughly, so as to keep on good terms. The result is that both the organization and the individual are harmed. This is one type of liberalism. 

To indulge in irresponsible criticism in private instead of actively putting forward one's suggestions to the organization. To say nothing to people to their faces but to gossip behind their backs, or to say nothing at a meeting but to gossip afterwards. To show no regard at all for the principles of collective life but to follow one's own inclination. This is a second type. 

To let things drift if they do not affect one personally; to say as little as possible while knowing perfectly well what is wrong, to be worldly wise and play safe and seek only to avoid blame. This is a third type. 

Not to obey orders but to give pride of place to one's own opinions. To demand special consideration from the organization but to reject its discipline. This is a fourth type. 

To indulge in personal attacks, pick quarrels, vent personal spite or seek revenge instead of entering into an argument and struggling against incorrect views for the sake of unity or progress or getting the work done properly. This is a fifth type. 

To hear incorrect views without rebutting them and even to hear counter-revolutionary remarks without reporting them, but instead to take them calmly as if nothing had happened. This is a sixth type. 

To be among the masses and fail to conduct propaganda and agitation or speak at meetings or conduct investigations and inquiries among them, and instead to be indifferent to them and show no concern for their well-being, forgetting that one is a Communist and behaving as if one were an ordinary non-Communist. This is a seventh type. 

To see someone harming the interests of the masses and yet not feel indignant, or dissuade or stop him or reason with him, but to allow him to continue. This is an eighth type. 

To work half-heartedly without a definite plan or direction; to work perfunctorily and muddle along--"So long as one remains a monk, one goes on tolling the bell." This is a ninth type. 

To regard oneself as having rendered great service to the revolution, to pride oneself on being a veteran, to disdain minor assignments while being quite unequal to major tasks, to be slipshod in work and slack in study. This is a tenth type. 

To be aware of one's own mistakes and yet make no attempt to correct them, taking a liberal attitude towards oneself. This is an eleventh type. 

We could name more. But these eleven are the principal types.
They are all manifestations of liberalism. Liberalism is extremely harmful in a revolutionary collective. It is a corrosive which eats away unity, undermines cohesion, causes apathy and creates dissension. It robs the revolutionary ranks of compact organization and strict discipline, prevents policies from being carried through and alienates the Party organizations from the masses which the Party leads. It is an extremely bad tendency. Liberalism stems from petty-bourgeois selfishness, it places personal interests first and the interests of the revolution second, and this gives rise to ideological, political and organizational liberalism. People who are liberals look upon the principles of Marxism as abstract dogma. They approve of Marxism, but are not prepared to practice it or to practice it in full; they are not prepared to replace their liberalism by Marxism. These people have their Marxism, but they have their liberalism as well--they talk Marxism but practice liberalism; they apply Marxism to others but liberalism to themselves. They keep both kinds of goods in stock and find a use for each. This is how the minds of certain people work. Liberalism is a manifestation of opportunism and conflicts fundamentally with Marxism. It is negative and objectively has the effect of helping the enemy; that is why the enemy welcomes its preservation in our midst. Such being its nature, there should be no place for it in the ranks of the revolution. We must use Marxism, which is positive in spirit, to overcome liberalism, which is negative. A Communist should have largeness of mind and he should be staunch and active, looking upon the interests of the revolution as his very life and subordinating his personal interests to those of the revolution; always and everywhere he should adhere to principle and wage a tireless struggle against all incorrect ideas and actions, so as to consolidate the collective life of the Party and strengthen the ties between the Party and the masses; he should be more concerned about the Party and the masses than about any private person, and more concerned about others than about himself. Only thus can he be considered a Communist. All loyal, honest, active and upright Communists must unite to oppose the liberal tendencies shown by certain people among us, and set them on the right path. This is one of the tasks on our ideological front. 

The second step to freeing the Great Jewish Diaspora is to understand that we only have this revolutionary path because of the founders of the Bundist Movement. 

The founders of the Bundist Movement are:
abraham Weizfeld PhD the Chairman of the Revolution.
Dona Newman the Emissary of Solidarity.
Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua the Cleric of Public Relations.

The purpose of the Chairman of the Revolution is to make sure that the revolution is never criminalized, or at least to keep the Revolution legal long enough to gather strength in order to fight back against any coming Totalitarian takeover. The office of the Chairman must protect Jewish honor making him fundamentally at war with Zionism at all times.  

The purpose of the Emissary of Solidarity is organizational structure and to promote solidarity with the Jewish Vanguard and to promote and encourage Solidarity to the allies that most benefit the needs of the Jewish Proletariat. The office of the Emissary must be at odds with Americanism and disrupt attempts to be pacified by reforms even if this means to embrace new allies if other members show her that their Solidarity is true.  

The purpose of the Cleric of Public Relations is to function as good P.R for Bundism but in the more active matter he is to protect the reputation of esoteric matters such as cultural theocracy, mysticism, religiosity, and non-western traditionalism against the reactionary forces of cold science, secular supremacy, christian fundamentalism, and mystical forgery. The office of the Cleric is a position of Jewish Renewal for the Orthodox, the Reform, the Conservative, and the Reconstructionalist this means also that he must have a grasp of other religions and differing cultural norms. He must have a diplomatic tone to scientists, he must know how to unite scientists and mystics against the dangers of creation-science and mystic-charlatanism, but above all he must advocate for coexistence over the notion of communism. 

Now that I have gone over that, I am going to both criticize and take a stand in defense to the founders of the Bundist Movement.

On the Cleric of Public Relations, Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua.

Criticism first; no one understands us better than you, it is you who listen to us and have put forward our ideas to a more public forum. You are a pro at correcting myself, Miriam, Marvin, Hannah, and Uri.
So do you have such a hard time correcting both abraham Weizfeld and Dona Newman?

To hear incorrect views without rebutting them and even to hear counter-revolutionary remarks without reporting them, but instead to take them calmly as if nothing had happened. This is a sixth type.

Ironically that is the one most quoted by yourself, but can you apply it to yourself? I sure hope so. Are you intimidated by the fact that both Dr. Weizfeld and Ms. Newman are older than you? I have a hard time believing this because as for myself, Miriam, Marvin, and Uri we too are older than you, only Hannah is younger than you. You have no problem correcting us when you find any of us in error.

Standing in Defense second; I demand that the accusations thrown at Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua from time to time be put to an end.
Miriam could have defended Comrade Net last month when he was accused of being a Male Chauvinist, so what if Comrade Net is a Masculinist. His sex life also has nothing to do with his Masculinism, his womanizing addiction when in recovery from it or in relapse of have nothing to do with his Masculinism. Keep in mind that Miriam Emesberg is also a Masculinist and even more so than Comrade Net and no one would dare say that she is a male chauvinistic self-hating woman. Miriam is a traditional anti-feminist woman who would not be political if she was able to have children, we forget all the time that not every woman who hates feminism is a self-hating woman, Miriam is also an Atheist so you can not scapegoat her anti-feminism on theocracy, so why attack Comrade Net? Comrade Net has kept his sex life away from work and protected every Jewish woman in the Bundist Movement he has never denied his addiction to women, and I think we often forget that he is also a straight tomgirl and neglect to understand how many women have thrown themselves at him, I have seen this with my own eyes Niggas!!!  Comrade Net has protected women outside of the Jewish community as well. When in Venezuela I could hear both Marvin and Uri speculating as to whether or not Comrade Net is a Macho Chauvinist and I am addressing this now, Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua will even provide disclaimers about himself in fear that someone will hear the wrong things about him and then get the wrong idea, this is shameful. Marvin and Uri need to stop feeding the any notion that would give a misnomer of validity of this his rumor started from a political enemy who was a confirmed Neo-Nazi has anyone forgotten this? Comrade Net's wife is fully aware of his sexual addictions, and I never wanted this to be a public discussion but I refuse to let a rumor started by a Neo-Nazi destroy Comrade Net who also has protected me from Gay bashing, I have even enlisted his protection as of late because I'm getting to old to fight. When my previous Boyfriend was murdered the first person to ask me how I was holding up was Comrade Net. Gossip is against Judaism, never forget this.

On the Emissary of Solidarity, Dona Newman.

Criticism first; despite the progress you have made towards a new dialogue concerning the Christian communities throughout the World you still harbor emotional grudges towards the Church not distinguishing between the Eastern Church and the Western Church. You have been known to even block off conversations when Revolutionary Catholics of many types confront you. You have attacked the Trinity as unchristian even though non-Trinitarian Christianity is disingenuous to the entire Theological context of Christianity which is based in the Christian Bible it self. Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua who has the best grasp of the foundations of Christianity has pointed this out, Miriam Emesberg who has the strongest grip of history knows this and has even proven this to be the case. It is both populist and historical revisionist to attack the Council of Nicaea as elitist, pointing out how according to the Gospels Jesus never said he was divine does not explain away how he says he is one with that divinity, nor does it explain why Jesus praises Thomas for calling him divine. Now obviously we disagree with the Christian doctrine of the Trinity which is clearly based in the Christian Bible it self, but we also disagree with the Wiccan concept of the Trinity that they believe in, yet none of us would attack the beliefs of Wicca. You met the leaders of the Christian Socialist Front and admitted that their cause was essential for World Revolution then turned around the next day and made them the brunt of your jokes. Whenever our closest allies inquire about the Christian Socialist Front you pretend to not be as informed about this as you are. You show great Solidarity and a lack of prejudice, except when it comes to Christians regardless of what type although you have been gracious to Unitarian Christians who always end up plotting against us. Whenever Comrade Net or Miriam give you proof of a Catholic Community usually filled with people of multiethnic background, sometimes even having several African refugees within you fail to look into it.  

To be among the masses and fail to conduct propaganda and agitation or speak at meetings or conduct investigations and inquiries among them, and instead to be indifferent to them and show no concern for their well-being, forgetting that one is a Communist and behaving as if one were an ordinary non-Communist. This is a seventh type.
and of course we are socialist non-communists but the point in context is what it is 

Standing in Defense second; it is despicable how much several Marxist allies accuse Dona Newman of being a reactionary for pointing out that Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels had been historical revisionists grounded in eurocentricity, she is correct whenever she points this out. Dona Newman utilizes both Marx and Engels when ever it is correct to do so. There are so many linear eurocentric claims made by Marx and Engels that it cripples dialectical materialism it is not historically revisionist to alter dialectical materialism when an incorrect line is being pushed. Her support of the Mexica Movement is also correct, it does not matter that they are nonviolent, as loyal citizens to whatever Country we live in we need to translate this in revolutionary terms and by this we know that our loyalty is to the indigenous of this Continent. We are for self-defense instead of nonviolence as we owe a debt as Jewry in the first World and we expect a debt payed to us, but this also means we are to protect the nonviolent. Dona Newman is not incorrect to push the line that the Mexica Movement is the Vanguard of the indigenous activists regardless if they recognize their own Socialism or not.   



On the Chairman of the Revolution, abraham Weizfeld PhD.

Criticism first; let me start by saying that I know full well that Muammar Gaddafi became a disconnected fool who at times was reactionary, I even know about the fascists that he let into his Country, and I know this not just because Marvin Eliyahu told me about it, I know because my Boyfriend is Libyan. You have made public statements saying that the people of Libya supported NATO, but this is not true. No one in Libya except counter-intelligence agents supported NATO. When Gaddafi lied about many things, it was wrong. But the outcome of what happened to Libya as a result of Imperialist invasion is wrong. Now I know that you support the program of Jamahiriya and that you even have improved versions of this in mind, I know that you are a supporter of Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, I am your biggest Comrade in that regards. But you need to make corrections to things you have publicly said that I suspect of being emotional rather than reasonable. You should admit that you were mistaken to support the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi as I know that you do not like the outcome of what has resulted from that Imperialist invasion.

To indulge in personal attacks, pick quarrels, vent personal spite or seek revenge instead of entering into an argument and struggling against incorrect views for the sake of unity or progress or getting the work done properly. This is a fifth type. 

Another criticism I make is that you don't call yourself Palestinian, I would have hoped that Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua would have convinced you to say that you are a Palestinian. As you are fully aware Dr. Weizfeld you can have more than one National identity.
You do more than just live with Palestinians, they let you speak for them, something they never let a non-Palestinian do. Do you realize that they consider you to be Palestinian? You are a Jewish Palestinian! I really wish you could come see us in Arizona Chairman Weizfeld because dare I say it I am positive I could talk to you man to man and we would have a lot in common in the Inter-National struggle. You are Jewish. You are Palestinian. That is a good thing, the original Neturei Karta were also Jewish Palestinians and let us not forget that you know the Samaritans and their cultural history is tied to Jewish history. You are a Jewish Palestinian, learn more Arabic and own it.

Standing in Defense second; I would like to make clear that none of us support Bernie Sanders for President. Now that being said I am going to defend the cause of abraham Weizfeld pushing for us to vote for Bernie Sanders. That is not reactionary or revisionist of him in any way. I know that all five of us of the Bund Council Staff had been relieved when Dona Newman came out saying that she like the rest of us would not vote for Bernie Sanders and then this gave Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua the incentive to say what he actually thought about Bernie Sanders, it is just as complicated as we suspected. I wish everyone would stop getting scared of abraham Weizfeld's proposals to support Bernie Sanders, that is what the Chairman of the Revolution is suppose to do, he is suppose to encourage the legal strategies in what ever way he finds to be credible. So if we find that a Bernie Sanders presidency would kill Revolutionary spirit and Dr. Weizfeld does not understand why, just remember that all we have to do is translate what Dr. Weizfeld says into a material aim in a way that does not contradict our logic. Obviously this means that we need to gain control over the Jewish left in America make sure that it is us who puts the questions to Bernie Sanders publicly on record. We need to get to work on these questions, we also need to pressure Democrats to denounce the Right-Wing populist notions of Gun Control, if this pressure is ineffective we move on. We most likely will move on anyway, but let me remind everyone that while we all promote Eco-Socialism it was Dr. Weizfeld who actually campaigned for Eco-Socialism in Quebec, anyone who fails to realize how revolutionary Dr. abraham Weizfeld truly is, proves to be ignorant of the struggle.   

White Nationalism is on the rise and the Christchurch mosque shootings were indeed terrorist attacks at mosques. This took place in Christchurch, New Zealand, during Friday Prayer on March 15, 2019. We need to stop talking about nonviolence and Gun Control, the State is undemocratic and we speak for our selves and must get armed, the Police are White supremacists and any talk of Gun Control or nonviolence will end in anew Holocaust, just keeping this real.

Free the Jewish Proletariat from Zionist neocolonial exportation and Americanist assimilation via western christian supremacy.

Wherever we are, that is our homeland, we are from here.

Hereness not Elsewhereness.

Free the Diaspora with Proletarian Doikeit.

By Isaiah P. Kamatstein 

First Worldism holds back Revolutionary Spirit

By Dona Newman 

Before I get into what I am trying to convey let me point out that Imperialism has evolved into Globalism and that it does not matter who first started the term "Globalism" because it simply refers to the highest stage of Imperialism. The Capitalists have hijacked dialectics and they use this against Revolutionary Socialists.
The Right Wing says things that are true often mixed in with their special bits of disinformation; this weaponizing of information is a psychological operation used against the public. Counter-Intelligence is much stronger today than it was in the 1960s and 1970s.
If we are to win we must understand that the left/right paradigm is simply a social status quo structure intended on preventing Revolution. Ignoring the left/right paradigm will not make it go away.
Acknowledging the left/right paradigm correctly is the first step.
Pulling out the undesirable elements from the Left Wing is the second step.Then the Revolutionary left must break the left/right paradigm; this is the third step.

 For years I have explained to Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua this course of regressive and progressive movement; it is missing from dialectics. 
We need to understand that there is a difference between being reactionary and being responsive.
Another thing to understand is being progressive in the Arab world can aid the harmful push towards assimilation and cultural genocide. Usually it is the opposite of bigotry to be regressive in the Arab world. Being regressive in Europe and White America on the other hand is bigotry; more often than not. Europe needs to be more progressive and the Arab world needs to be more regressive.
The Islamic State of Syria and the Levant is not regressive in anyway; it is actually reactionary.
The Arab Nationalism of Gamal Abdel Nasser was responsive not reactionary.
I am going to have to write about this further, but it is important to just show you how much is missing from dialectics.
There are four worlds.
And to explain that it is necessary to understand this in the context of the times during the Cold War and our time now after the Cold War.
The First World is a reference to the Nation-States that benefit the most from Globalism.
The Third World is a reference to the Countries that are exploited by the First World.
The Fourth World is a reference to the Nations stripped of any Autonomy and/or Identity in the context of permanent Colonial projects such as the: 
Palestinians under the Cultural Genocidal attack and Occupation of the Colonial project of Israel. The Māori under the Occupation of the Colonial project of New Zealand.
The Aboriginal Australians under the Occupation of the Colonial project of Australia.
The First American Groups such as the First Nations under the Occupation of Canada, the Native Americans under the Occupation of the United States of America, and the Mexicans who are under the Cultural Genocidal attack of both Canada and the United States of America.
The Second World during the Cold War was the Countries, Nation-States and People-Nations that were developing. After the Cold War the Second World constitutes one Nation in decline, that is none other than We The Jewish Nation.   
We are in a Revolutionary situation and that means we need to put the Jewish Nation first and be less concerned with helping the United States of America, our loyalty is to the Indigenous of America not to the New Civil Rights Movement we are seeing emerge in the First World. However we should be in solidarity with the First World Proletariat; the Black People who are descendants from the Slaves are the only true Proletariat of the First World.
We need to understand that we must be loyal to the Mexica Movement, the Navajo Activists, and the Bolivarian Revolution of Chavez and Maduro. If we help with the reforms in the First World we are showing ourselves to be unethical. The Mexica Movement and the Navajo Activists are in a Fourth World struggle. The Bolivarian Revolution of Chavez and Maduro are in a Third World struggle.
First Worldism is dependent on NeoColonialism and this is counter to all attempts at a truly effective Constitutional Assembly.
First Worldism holds back Revolutionary Spirit and ensures a furthering of Globalism. We need to understand that Jewish Revolutionary Socialism has to be 100% Anti-First Worldist.
Increasing all the protectionism, welfare, and democratic reforms in America, Canada, and Europe will clamp down on the Third World and further erase the Fourth World. It is counter-revolutionary to participate in a Government that is still at War with Indigenous Peoples such as the USA. We the Jewish People are in a Revolutionary situation but most every American we know is part of the very system we must be against as it contradicts the Torah Culture. The only factor that is Revolutionary in the First World is the Blacks Proletariat and they need our solidarity. The First World Working Class is in no way Proletariat.
First Worldism is not compatible with Bundism.

World Jewry stands against Zionism because Zionism is anti-Jewish!

By Dona Newman

Americanism controls Zionism.

Zionists do not hold power over the USA.

Zionism is against Judaism.

Zionism is based on Americanism. 

 

I unmask America as Jezebel and Netanyahu as the blasphemous King Ahab. Jezebel is the evil melting pot trying to assimilate the Jewish People and rob us of the Torah Culture which is the very foundation of the Jewish Nation. King Ahab lives and the Prophet Elijah gave warning to him but he would not listen. Recall that every Passover we pour a Cup for Elijah in hopes that he will proclaim the Messiah and we say "Next year in Jerusalem" but the Ba'al Idol better known as Donald Trump has sold out Jerusalem and now destroyed the coming of the Messiah. 

The Messiah who can never gatherer together the lost tribes of Israel because they are the Palestinians who are now to be ethnically cleansed from the Holy Land. This means that the Palestinians who are majority Muslim and Christian will never convert to Judaism, it is against Torah Culture to force conversion or even advertise it. For anyone to convert to Judaism it has to be wanted the potential convert technically has to be turned down a few times before made Jewish. The majority of Palestinians have been mostly turn off to the idea of ever becoming Jewish thanks to the Zionist system. King Ahab has brought about a great disaster to us all and Jezebel rules his Soul. 

 

King Ahab is always under the control of Jezebel.

Jezebel worships Ba'al and so does her proxy husband King Ahab.

Fiscal drought has come upon the Holy Land.

This what Zionism does, it causes Americanist idolatry. 

 

Jewish anti-Zionist Revolution is the only answer and this only comes from Bundism.

There has always been an Antisemitic element to Zionism. Zionism glorifies Jewish Villains.

The State of Israel treats the blasphemous Simon bar Kokhba like some type of Jewish hero even though he was an enemy of the Torah Culture. Simon bar Kokhba presided over an army of Jewish insurgents numbering some 200,000, but had compelled its young recruits to prove their valour by each man chopping off one of his own fingers. The Sages of Israel complained to him why he marred the people of Israel with such blemishes. Whenever he would go forth into battle, he was reported as saying: "O Master of the universe, there is no need for you to assist us, but do not embarrass us either!"

Connect the dots.

It is Anti-Jewish to support the State of Israel. 

It is Anti-Jewish to support the United States of America. 

Zionism is the proxy of Americanism.  

Judaism is fundamentally against Zionism.

The Alt-Right and the Zionists are allies no matter how much they pretend to hate each other. 

Thursday; last day of February of 2019

Something very bad happened on February 28, 2019.
The place is Downtown Phoenix, Arizona.

This is how I have gathered this together based on what Marvin Eliyahu has told me:

Marvin Eliyahu drove Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua and Uri Adiah to a New York-styled Deli to talk about a collective position that we are trying to further develop concerning a political stance we must put into a very particular context. Marvin Eliyahu was to drop them off because this conversation was exclusive for both Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua and Uri Adiah as the Bundist Movement's full policy on quite a few matters is still in development. When they arrived at the Deli Marvin came in with them to drink a Soda and have some small talk with them before he drove away. Marvin got up and saw what he was confidently sure was three JDL Zionists in one of the booths looking in their direction. Marvin told both Comrade Net and Uri that he suspected the men in that booth to be members of the Jewish Defense League. Uri told Marvin that he was just being paranoid.

So Marvin drove back to the Apartment shared by Marvin and Uri,  as he walked into his Apartment he noticed that Comrade Net left his cell phone behind. Marvin drove back to the Deli with Net's cell phone and when he got back they were gone. Marvin asked the Deli workers where the two men he dropped off went. The Deli manager said that Net and Uri left with three other men. Marvin stuck around the Deli for an hour and a half in hopes that they would return. Comrade Net and Uri did not return so Marvin sent a message to Hannah Toff expressing concern. Net was supposed to meet with Hannah later that day. Hannah drove up to the Deli to meet Marvin as he told her all of his suspicions.

This is how I have gathered this together based on what Hannah Toff has told me:

Hannah Toff drove up to the Deli to meet Marvin Eliyahu; their conversation was quite detailed. Hannah knows a lot of shady people and has been aware that despite certain claims that the Jewish Defense League has disband, this is simply not true.
Hannah along with Comrade Net and Marvin have always stated that the JDL Zionists maintain large membership numbers and neither myself nor any other member of the Bundist Movement disagrees with that premise. Hannah Toff asked people in the Arizona underworld questions, those whom she had questioned will not be named in this Article. For hours she asked around and finally a few people told her what they knew and even detailed information about the whereabouts concerning Kahanists in Arizona. She managed to get a much needed license plate number and set off to find our kidnapped Comrades.

Finally in the City of Glendale, Arizona she found the White Van a block away from a Burger King and she took a Baseball Bat from the trunk of her Car and then went to the Van and busted up the Windows, stormed into the Van and beat up the three JDL goons with her Baseball Bat. She untied Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua and Uri Adiah gave them back their wallets and Uri's now cracked up bushed Cell Phone. She handed Comrade Net's Cell Phone back too and because it had been in the Apartment of Uri and Marvin it had no damage. Comrade Net went into a fit of rage opened up a box of nails and popped the tires. It seemed as though one of the JDL goons was waking up and so Hannah then beat his head a bit bloody then she took all the Guns from the Van and put them in a Bag so they could not hurt anyone. Then it seems as if another one of the JDL goons was waking up so Comrade Net took a stick from the ground that just happen to be there then he too started to beat the one of JDL goons. Hannah then started to further beat them up fearing that they could recover and Comrade Net was with her beating them up. Uri fearing that this would get out of hand told them to "Chill out Comrades they are down!" Uri pulled Comrade Net aside and then calmed him down, but Hannah just went more ballistic as she then vandalized the Van further ripping everything out of the Van and breaking off the steering wheel. Uri said to Comrade Net "Order her to stand down!" seeing that a crowd was gathering he did so. Net and Uri came with Hannah to her Car she then drove them away, she dropped Uri off at his Apartment where Marvin Eliyahu his roommate and best friend was there to give him a bear hug. She then drove Comrade Net back to his primary place of residence. 

This is what I have gathered together concerning the events based on the testimonies of Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua and Uri Adiah:

After Marvin Eliyahu left with the understanding that he would pick them up in an hour; Comrade Net and Uri began their discussion. Comrade Net had the Kosher tuna sandwich with rye bread being that he is Orthodox and Uri had the Bacon club sandwich being that he is Reform, Uri payed for the lunch because usually it is Comrade Net or myself that pays for restaurant meals. Comrade Net and Uri had started their talk and already they both drank a lot of Soda so it was only natural that they would have to take a restroom break.
This Deli is without Urinals, it simply has Toilet stalls.
Uri came out of the stall he occupied first when he came out there was the three JDL goons in front of the two stalls. One of the JDL goons pointed a Gun at Uri's head and with his other hand pressed his finger to his lips signaling to be quiet. Then shortly after that Comrade Net came out of the stall he occupied and one of the other JDL goons pointed a Gun at his head. Two JDL goons stood facing Comrade Net and Uri while one of the JDL goons was behind them.
The one who pointed his Gun at Net's head was the tall Hulk.
The one who pointed his Gun at Uri was the bald one.
And the one behind the two was the shorter one with a mustache.

When the five of the men had all stepped out of the Deli there was a White Van. Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua and Uri Adiah were forced into the Van. Comrade Net and Uri were tied up and then the Van drove away. Inside the Van there was a Kahanist flag and a Nazi flag before they gagged the two of them Comrade Net boldly said "How interesting to see you are allied with Fascism." and then the shorter JDL goon with a mustache punched Comrade Net across his forehead before gagging him. Uri had said nothing before he was gagged. The tall Hulk JDL goon said "We are Jewish National Socialists and had Hitler not targeted us we would have never gained our much needed State" Inside the Van there was also a Israeli flag, a ISIL flag, a FSA flag, and a Saudi flag. There was also a picture of Theodor Herzl and a picture of Meir Kahane next to each other.
In the Van was also visible several Israeli looking magazines with Hebrew letters on them and a box of nails. At some point they took away the wallets of my two Comrades and Uri's cell phone. They said a lot of things in Hebrew, but sometimes spoke English and they stopped the Van in at least four different places and the bald JDL goon hit Uri five times very fast in the face and said to him "You look part Arab, are you a Sand Nigger?" seeming to forget that Uri along with Comrade Net were both Gagged. Later the tall Hulk JDL goon said to them "We are going to drive out to the desert soon and shoot you both dead no one will understand what has happened, this is Arizona after all where disappearances go unnoticed." Just then Hannah Toff came to the rescue.


Extra details and conclusions:
Marvin Eliyahu and Hannah Toff had originally tried to file a Police Report but the Cops said that the report was false. We will not be ever trying to contact the Police again for anything as they are part of the problem, we are looking to see if we can find other ways to hold the JDL accountable, but so far the best answer seems to be to build up the Bundist Movement and be our own Law Enforcement in the same way the Black Panther Party was their own Law Enforcement. Another note of interest is that with Net's Debit Card a Double Whopper meal at Burger King was purchased by the JDL goons. We have reached a type of deterrence with Zionism in a strange way especially with Kahanists. Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua and Hannah Toff may have destroyed property, however these Kahanist Zionist Fascists have been weaken as result and that is worth it. Both sides of this conflict would most likely be considered guilty or even more likely we Bundists would be singled out because in Arizona it is known that Zionists and Neo-Nazis stick together and have pull in Arizonan Law.  Most politically Mundane people will look at this Article and laugh at it as though it is a joke and that is only because most Americans do not understand what happens in Arizona and furthermore most Americans do not wish to confront what Auto-determined Jewish people go through at the hands of Neo-Nazis and Zionists.  

By Dona Newman 

The Ben-Gurion Interrogation

by Dr abraham Weizfeld PhD
2019-01-25

Just a few days ago I was in a state of limbo sitting before two agents of the Ministry of the Interior at the Ben-Gurion airport, who assumed the roles of a Golda Meir by questioning my entry to the sacred realm of the Zionist State of Israel. It was of no consequence to the two women that my Jewish Agency Visa signed by the Consul of the State of Israel in Montréal was set for three years. The big deal was that I was not supposed to go into the Palestinian territories even though some 600,000 Zionist Israeli citizens are already living in the West Bank, with plentiful financial subsidies as well.
    Somehow they presumed that it was illegal to travel into the Palestinian territories past the famous Green Line because that was not the State of Israel, even though Israel assumes that it is. True enough, the Green Line is not an international border since Israel does not recognise the independent State of Palestine. Nonetheless, it was transformed into an impenetrable barrier by some sort of law that does not exist. By contrast, the constant flow of Christians to Bethlehem in the Palestinian Territories does not seem to violate this virtual law.
    As for Israeli citizens, there does seem to be some sort of legal barrier which is announced on big red signs at the entrance to the Palestinian cities and villages of the West Bank. It used to read that it was illegal for Israeli citizens to enter the Palestinian municipalities and anyone who actually does is subject to a penalty of two years imprisonment! But the sign was changed some years back since it gave the impression that there was an Apartheid policy in effect and so it was changed to say that the forbidden entry policy was for the safety of the Israelis concerned. Of course, the Palestinian-Israelis who went to Nablus to buy goods at advantages prices were not considered to be in violation of the edit. Hebrew-Israelis however were and are not supposed to make contact with the Palestinian non-citizens living in the ‘Territories’. The presence of the original Israelites called Samaritans or Karites, still living as Palestinians on Mount Gerizim in Nablus with identity papers from the Palestinian Authority, the Israel State as well as the State of Jordan is simply ignored.
    The routes to Israel’s colonies laced next to the Palestinian municipalities on private lands are serviced by particular roads and buses exclusive to the colonists. The idea being that seeing no Palestinians is equivalent to knowing no Palestinians which amounts to rejecting the existence of the Palestinians. This is a rather difficult task since within Israel proper, or ’48 Palestine, there are quite a number of Palestinians nonetheless who actually live in equal numbers in such municipalities as Jerusalem-Al Quds, Haifa, and Acca who are furthermore a majority in the northern regions where Christian Palestinians are more numerous. During the initial sweep of Zionist militias who forced the Palestinian villagers to escape the campaign of mini-massacres in each village during the 1947-49 Nakba, or war of independence, the Christian Palestinians were a sensitive subject for the Prime Minister Ben Gurion since Israel relied on the Christian Occidental powers for their sponsorship of the Zionist State in the United Nations General Assembly. In addition, there were some Jewish residents who protected Palestinians by placing themselves in front of the rifles of the Zionist militias as well, both of which prevented the wholesale expulsion to continue. Nonetheless, 750-825,000 Palestinian refugees were forced to flee. One friend’s grandfather told us in a video posted on my YouTube channel that the radio messages calling on the Palestinians to flee was from the BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) Arabic language radio transmission and not from the Arab states radio news. At the time under British occupation, the Palestinians were not allowed to own a radio and the BBC Arabic service was amplified by loud-speakers in the town centres as the only legal radio news available.
    The remaining Israeli Palestinian population of 21-25% - if one includes the Druze Palestinian minority - is approximately the percentage projected by the Zionist political advocate Jabotinsky in his 1920 writings who advocated the expulsion of the Palestinian population to make ‘A Land without a People for a People without a Land’. Interestingly this remaining Palestinian population has 13 seats in the current Knesset-Parliament of Israel. Considering that only 50% of the Israeli-Palestinian population voted in the previous election it is conceivable that with a greater voter turnout the Palestinian parties could hold a balance of power after the upcoming election in April 2019.
    Back in the interrogation room at the Ben-Gurion Airport, a list of my sins was being written down in five pages of notes which were gleaned from my YouTube videos. One particular video made at the Jerusalem crossing point last year was my comment to an officer after he refused to answer me in the Jewish Yiddish language, making some disparaging remarks to me. My response to him was that evidently, I was Jewish but that he was a Zionist and that this was a big difference. The Palestinian journalist next to me recorded this episode and it was broadcast on the major Internet Palestinian news service Al Quds News Network and was viewed by 37,000 people. This theme is quite well appreciated by the Palestinians.
    The next topic of discussion in the interrogation room was the matter of making videos of the soldiers since they could be doing ‘bad things’. While there is a draft law prepared to make such videos of soldiers illegal, it has failed to pass in the Knesset, since the government has collapsed over the proposed bill to enforce conscription of the Orthodox Jewish residents of Jerusalem, who refuse to even register for military service. While the medias image of Jewish Orthodox ‘settlers’ has created a stereotype of fanatic Zionists, actually the greater part of the Orthodox refuse to accept the authority of the State and have carried a campaign of civil disobedience to resist induction, even going to jail to do so.  The government coalition of Netanyahu’s thus lost its major partner the Shas religious party and was forced to call an election even before the  Attorney General Avichai Mendelblit was about to submit three accusations of corruption against that Prime Minister.
    Meanwhile, at the Gaza frontier, about 300 Palestinians have been murdered, 6000 maimed - shot with live fire - while about 29,000 have been injured while demonstrating for the Right of Return since 80% of the resident population are refugees from ’48 Palestine. The Israelis who come to demonstrate on the other side of the fence have even stood in front of the soldiers M-16s to prevent further shootings.
    Now the actual story is this; the Palestinians are in a decades-long revolution against a military power that claims to be protecting the Jewish People and the Israelis in particular. This pretext is false as I can sense the response to my new book and its title ‘The Federation of Palestinian and Hebrew Nations’ elicits a favourable response from all the Palestinians that I have spoken to here in Nablus, Palestine. Meanwhile, the Left in the West is engaged in a futile unproductive debate of whether the ‘Two-State Solution’ or the ‘One-State Solution’ should be favoured. Here in Palestine that is not the question. Such a binary antimony ignores the Right of Return of the 7 million Palestinian refugees. The actual problem is that the Hebrew Israelis will not accept even the idea of becoming a minority again since that is the equivalent to being a persecuted nationality, either in the mild form of the Islamic Millet or as a targeted People by the Western Christian Nation-States. However, with a constitutional provision for National-Cultural Autonomy in a Federation, such a fear is in effect nullified.
    More so, the context to take into consideration is not that which is presumed. While there is much talk of the two sides in theocratic terms, even while a majority of Jewish people are no longer religious, there is a sociological demographic that is ignored. While the Palestinian and Hebrew populations are about equal inside the territory comprised by the State of Israel, there are two considerations that contradict this simplism. First of all, a majority of the Palestinian People live outside of Palestine as refugees under duress and are not permitted to return, in addition to the internal refugees displaced from their homes and lands. In addition, the number of Arabs inside the State is not what it may seem to some since presently half the Hebrew population are actually Arabs from North Africa in the Maghreb countries of Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria and Egypt as well as Iraq, and Yemen. To consider the Arabs of the present State of Israel one must count the Jewish Arabs and so the existing balance of demographics is actually about 10 million Arabs and 3 million Jewish Hebrews who are of Ashken’azi and Russian descent. This non-theocratic context reveals the class and social strata character of the Israel State which is European in origin and dominated by an exclusive elite of Ashken’azi Zionist caste members. In effect, the Jewish Arabs have more in common with their Palestinian neighbours than they do with the elite imposed from European origins. The resultant common interests of the Arab nationalities provides for the potential transformation that reverses the historic discrimination enforced against the Palestinian Nation. Rather than force, war and violence it is the transformation of consciousness that would bring about the reversal of the hierarchical domination that relies upon militarism and fear to maintain control.
    Together with the return of the Palestinian refugees numbering 7 million, the 17 million Arabs of the country can find a common interest to live again in harmony and peace alongside the 3 million European Ashken’azim who would find their identity in the National-Cultural Autonomy of their national identity by equality with the Jewish Arabs of the same Nation. Autonomy is comprised of a shared language, religious history, educational system, government and national security police. The point, however, is that each major Nation would live in a reciprocal relation of Autonomy and not either being in a position to dictate social criteria from a position of centralised State control. In any case, the State formation is a European model that is certainly unsuitable for the multi-national social formations of the Orient and is found to be lacking even in the European context which is seeking to overcome that paradigm in the blundering attempts at Confederation in the European Union.
    This Palestinian struggle for coexistence in a multi-national society has endured over the decades and inspires other struggles in the Arab States known as the Arab Spring and furthermore stands as an example of endurance for social struggles throughout the world. The nature of the social struggle is not in itself violent but rather engenders the repression which relies upon force to maintain control. As opposed to the State it is the social struggle which seeks peace in the midst of oppression. The prospect of peace by a resilience in the face of occupation, militarism and imposed poverty looks forward to the day when the international agencies including the UN General Assembly, Security Council, the International Court of the Hague, the International Criminal Court and the Non-Aligned Nations will take it upon themselves to protect the indigenous people’s struggle for the peaceful resolution of social existence. To enable such a resolution the superpower machinations seeking to maintain their power bases and competitive edge in geopolitical manoeuvrings, oftentimes resulting in wars, must come to an end finally. It is in the resolution of this particular struggle that the world’s history will turn from the politics of power to the resolution of human interests from the premise of shared knowledge, rights and research.
   

Bundist Movement message to Marxist-Leninists, Marxist-Leninist-Maoists, & Maoist-Third Worldists.

By Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua

Just as WE the Jewish Bundist Diaspora Movement have reached out to the Ultra-Orthodox Jewish Community, making the statement that we did not truly understand Ultra-Orthodox Jewry and that likewise they did not understand us, that furthermore we stand in full solidarity with the Ultra-Orthodox Jewish Community in their stances against Zionism and Assimilation. We do the same for Marxist-Leninists, Marxist-Leninist-Maoists, and Maoist-Third Worldists. It is our position that we did not truly understand Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin, that likewise Lenin and Stalin did not understand the Jewish Labour Bund. And so now WE the Jewish Bundist Diaspora Movement apologize for not understanding the importance of Democratic-Centralism and the need for Vanguard parties to protect Ideology from Infiltrators and Reactionaries. The Bolsheviks misunderstood the Jewish Labour Bund, thinking we were Separatists, that we were odious. We Bundists are not Separatists, nor are we odious. It was the Marxists parties that recognized Zionism instead of Bundism. The Communists (in the context of both Marxism and Anarchism) have a flaw, this flaw is the idealist embracing of Hegel's Nation-State Theory. Although it is true that both Marxists and Anarchists wish to be rid of the State and we agree, yet this acknowledgement of the Nation-State has been at the root of many problems in their attempt to overthrow Capitalism.

WE the Jewish Bundist Diaspora Movement agree in part and disagree in part with Joseph Stalin's book Marxism and the National Question. A Nation is a Culture-plus; sometimes based on Culture and Religion, sometimes based on Culture and Ethnicity. We advocate to replace Nation-States with Federation-States and Democratic Federations. Joseph Stalin understood that Russia was not a Nation but a Country harboring many Nations. The key word to understand in the context of Bundism is Doikeit meaning Hereness; for wherever we are that is Our Homeland. We reject any Country calling it self Israel, because that is the collective name for all of World Jewry. The restoration of the Theocratic Kingdom of Israel can only exist under the conditions of a miracle and in Torah ethics this can only emerge without strife and/or bloodshed, Zionism cannot achieve this. We do not seek Zionist Utopia we seek Coexistence.

We advocate Auto-Determination over Self-Determination, for example we find that the only way to solve the crisis in Syria is not a Kurdish State, nor do we advocate for U.S Imperialism to replace Bashar Hafez al-Assad with some type of Imperialist puppet. Instead we call for National-Cultural Autonomy where both the Syrians and the Kurdish can live in Syria with their own self-governing laws recognized in a New-Syrian Multi-National Federation-State, this revelation can only be realized by both Nations within the Syrian-State. Both of the Nations within the Syrian-State must come to understand this on their own terms with out influence of Americanism, Zionism, Globalism or any other Imperial contradiction meddling with the crisis.

The Black Panther Party was practicing National-Cultural Autonomy whether they understand that this is what they were doing or not. The basic ideas of Bundism have all been proven correct, however Bundism had never fully developed its own theory beyond the basics it had concluded. In the past Bundism tried to compensate for this by adding either Anarchism or Trotskyism, this has failed. We are now seeing new material hope when we adopt Marxist-Leninist-Maoist and Maoist-Third Worldist theories into Bundism. If anyone Jewish is either Anarchist or Trotskyist and wishes to join the Bundist Movement we say "Welcome" and yet at the same time we will safeguard Bundism from reactionary, dogmatist, and/or revisionist theories that could serve to destroy our right to Auto-Determination as a People-Nation. We will not surrender Our Torah Culture and we will not surrender Our Religious Covenant. We wish to thank Jason Unruhe of the Maoist Rebel News for his alliance with the Bundist Movement. In conclusion all eight members of the Bundist Movement declare that Modern Bundism fits into the political category of Pantherism.