We need to study the old Jewish Labour Bund and the original Black Panther party if we are to succeed at overthrowing Zionism.
But as I see with both Black eyes and Jewish eyes.
I must warn everyone that the Liberalism by today's Young Blacks creates a disconnect between Blacks and the Third World. The Liberalism of European Jewry during the Civil Rights movement has a lot to do with why and how the Black Panther party got destroyed by COINTELPRO. It is good that the European Jewry stood with Martin Luther King Jr. and yet it needs to be asked why European Jewry did not stand with Malcolm X the same way and praise his criticisms of Zionism? Why couldn't European Jewry start the Bundist Movement back when the Black Panthers started a Rainbow Coalition? Obviously the European Jewish Ultra-Orthodox are not political, so it is not to them that I am addressing these questions. Fred Hampton was the greatest Black Panther who ever lived he started the Rainbow Coalition which in Bundist words would be called a United Front. The Rainbow Coalition was a coalition active in the late 1960s and early 1970s, founded in Chicago, Illinois by Fred Hampton of the revolutionary Black Panther party, along with William "Preacherman" Fesperman, Jack (Junebug) Boykin, Bobby Joe Mcginnis and Hy Thurman of the Young Patriots Organization and the founder of the Young Lords as a civil and human rights movement Jose Cha Cha Jimenez. It later expanded to include various ethnic socialist groups and community groups like the Lincoln Park Poor People's Coalition. It was associated with the rising Black Power movement. Had there been a Bundist Movement back then to join such a (United Front) Rainbow Coalition the ideology of Zionism and the State of Israel would not have existed anymore, Jewish Blacks could have united with Jewish Africans and Jewish Europeans and this would have dispelled the fictions of Jewish ethnicity. Such a Bundist Movement could have helped the Black Panthers understand that they were practicing National-Cultural Autonomy. In those days America was prideful of World War II and that could have been used to expose COINTELPRO with out it leaking or even needing to be declassified. We need a United Front today and we need to model it after the Rainbow Coalition. We should not use the words Rainbow Coalition because several Liberals call their alliances this.
January 28, 2019 Amber goes to work.
She leaves after a 5:30 p.m. meeting.
She tells her coworkers that she is not feeling well.
6:30 p.m. Amber Evans goes to a local store where she buys cold medicine and a Snickers bar.
The store’s security footage shows Amber leaving the store, she is missing for several days.
Her dead body is found in an Ohio River on March 25, 2019.
Let us start Revolution NOW!
To start it let revolutionize ourselves, we start by investigating how to Combat Liberalism.
COMBAT LIBERALISM: September 7, 1937 - By Mao Tse-tung.
We stand for active ideological struggle because it is the weapon for ensuring unity within the Party and the revolutionary organizations in the interest of our fight. Every Communist and revolutionary should take up this weapon. But liberalism rejects ideological struggle and stands for unprincipled peace, thus giving rise to a decadent, Philistine attitude and bringing about political degeneration in certain units and individuals in the Party and the revolutionary organizations. Liberalism manifests itself in various ways.
To let things slide for the sake of peace and friendship when a person has clearly gone wrong, and refrain from principled argument because he is an old acquaintance, a fellow townsman, a schoolmate, a close friend, a loved one, an old colleague or old subordinate. Or to touch on the matter lightly instead of going into it thoroughly, so as to keep on good terms. The result is that both the organization and the individual are harmed. This is one type of liberalism.
To indulge in irresponsible criticism in private instead of actively putting forward one's suggestions to the organization. To say nothing to people to their faces but to gossip behind their backs, or to say nothing at a meeting but to gossip afterwards. To show no regard at all for the principles of collective life but to follow one's own inclination. This is a second type.
To let things drift if they do not affect one personally; to say as little as possible while knowing perfectly well what is wrong, to be worldly wise and play safe and seek only to avoid blame. This is a third type.
Not to obey orders but to give pride of place to one's own opinions. To demand special consideration from the organization but to reject its discipline. This is a fourth type.
To indulge in personal attacks, pick quarrels, vent personal spite or seek revenge instead of entering into an argument and struggling against incorrect views for the sake of unity or progress or getting the work done properly. This is a fifth type.
To hear incorrect views without rebutting them and even to hear counter-revolutionary remarks without reporting them, but instead to take them calmly as if nothing had happened. This is a sixth type.
To be among the masses and fail to conduct propaganda and agitation or speak at meetings or conduct investigations and inquiries among them, and instead to be indifferent to them and show no concern for their well-being, forgetting that one is a Communist and behaving as if one were an ordinary non-Communist. This is a seventh type.
To see someone harming the interests of the masses and yet not feel indignant, or dissuade or stop him or reason with him, but to allow him to continue. This is an eighth type.
To work half-heartedly without a definite plan or direction; to work perfunctorily and muddle along--"So long as one remains a monk, one goes on tolling the bell." This is a ninth type.
To regard oneself as having rendered great service to the revolution, to pride oneself on being a veteran, to disdain minor assignments while being quite unequal to major tasks, to be slipshod in work and slack in study. This is a tenth type.
To be aware of one's own mistakes and yet make no attempt to correct them, taking a liberal attitude towards oneself. This is an eleventh type.
We could name more. But these eleven are the principal types.
They are all manifestations of liberalism.
Liberalism is extremely harmful in a revolutionary collective. It is a corrosive which eats away unity, undermines cohesion, causes apathy and creates dissension. It robs the revolutionary ranks of compact organization and strict discipline, prevents policies from being carried through and alienates the Party organizations from the masses which the Party leads. It is an extremely bad tendency.
Liberalism stems from petty-bourgeois selfishness, it places personal interests first and the interests of the revolution second, and this gives rise to ideological, political and organizational liberalism.
People who are liberals look upon the principles of Marxism as abstract dogma. They approve of Marxism, but are not prepared to practice it or to practice it in full; they are not prepared to replace their liberalism by Marxism. These people have their Marxism, but they have their liberalism as well--they talk Marxism but practice liberalism; they apply Marxism to others but liberalism to themselves. They keep both kinds of goods in stock and find a use for each. This is how the minds of certain people work.
Liberalism is a manifestation of opportunism and conflicts fundamentally with Marxism. It is negative and objectively has the effect of helping the enemy; that is why the enemy welcomes its preservation in our midst. Such being its nature, there should be no place for it in the ranks of the revolution.
We must use Marxism, which is positive in spirit, to overcome liberalism, which is negative. A Communist should have largeness of mind and he should be staunch and active, looking upon the interests of the revolution as his very life and subordinating his personal interests to those of the revolution; always and everywhere he should adhere to principle and wage a tireless struggle against all incorrect ideas and actions, so as to consolidate the collective life of the Party and strengthen the ties between the Party and the masses; he should be more concerned about the Party and the masses than about any private person, and more concerned about others than about himself. Only thus can he be considered a Communist.
All loyal, honest, active and upright Communists must unite to oppose the liberal tendencies shown by certain people among us, and set them on the right path. This is one of the tasks on our ideological front.
Next I explain who and what is the Bund Council Staff.
The Bund Council Staff consists of:
MYSELF: Isaiah P. Kamatstein – Councilman of Committees
Uri Adiah – Councilman of National Affairs
Miriam Emesberg – Councilwoman of Education
Hannah Toff – Councilwoman of Strategic Projects
Marvin Eliyahu – Councilman of World Forums
MYSELF the Councilman of Committees -
The purpose of the Councilman of Committees is to form political committees between the Bundist Movement and larger groups that are necessary yet hard to achieve in dialogue and relations. Now our context of committee an alliance congress between the Bundist Movement and such a group, usually in the context of religion and non-national gatherings.
The main Committees I work to form are;
LGBT Committee.
Catholic Church Committee.
Muslim Committee.
Orthodox Church Committee.
New Community Mafia Committee.
Uri Adiah the Councilman of National Affairs -
There are two purposes of the Councilman of National Affairs.
The first is to form strong ties between the Jewish Nation and other Nationalities. The second is to evaluate the National information based on the material conditions accordingly both peoplehood and geopolitical factors.
Miriam Emesberg the Councilwoman of Education -
The purpose of the Councilwoman of Education is to provide Jewish education in both academic and mythological terms to the Jewish Vanguard, always in a cultural context sometimes in a religious context. The Councilwoman of Education is to safeguard the Jewish Community from Modernist Secular Conformity. The Councilwoman of Education is to dispel right-wing propaganda, leftist populist deception, centrist liberalism, euroeccentric historical revisionism prevalent in Capitalist, Communist, and Fascist doctrines. It is also the duty of the Councilwoman of Education to be educated in the matters of Civil Rights struggles, revolutionary struggles, and reformation movements and then teach it to the Vanguard so that this is passed on to the broader Jewish Community.
Hannah Toff the Councilwoman of Strategic Projects -
The purpose of the Councilwoman of Strategic Projects is to find the correct strategies needed for legal deterrence against hostile police forces. She must have a knowledge of weapons, and law in the use of those weapons.
Marvin Eliyahu the Councilman of World Forums -
The purpose of the Councilman of World Forums is to literally start World Forums, this is the most non-religious office within the entire
Bund Council Staff, the matter of World Forums deals with Countries, Territories, and World Political Organizations, not Nations. But sometimes Nations have Countries so the office of World Forums does work in close connection to the office of National Affairs.
Criticism first; on MYSELF the Councilman of Committees.
It took me to long to approach these issues, and I hope that we will not waste to much time anymore. I saw issues and I ignored them for a long time.
To let things slide for the sake of peace and friendship when a person has clearly gone wrong, and refrain from principled argument because he is an old acquaintance, a fellow townsman, a schoolmate, a close friend, a loved one, an old colleague or old subordinate. Or to touch on the matter lightly instead of going into it thoroughly, so as to keep on good terms. The result is that both the organization and the individual are harmed. This is one type of liberalism.
I am guilty of Liberalism, and I hope that I have fixed this.
Every time I go along to get along, I harm us all, I fear being accused of arrogance. My fears hold us back, I will work harder to not stray in fear of attack. I will do my best to not error like this ever again.
Standing in Defense second; on MYSELF the Councilman of Committees.
I get wrongfully attacked by Anarchists for pointing out their historical failings in reply to them when they make populist propaganda. I do not attack Anarchists nor do I go out of my way to slander them, it is strange that I get attacked for "Pro-Stalinist ideas" I do not call myself Marxist-Leninist, but sure I absorb much of it. Yet many Anarchists will use Black Panthers to justify things to me forgetting that they where not in anyway Anarchist.
We take in Emma Goldman's Syndicalism: the Modern Menace to Capitalism very seriously, so we are not opposed to every Anarchist idea, but Anarchism it self is more historically revisionist than Marxism. As far as Joseph Stalin is concerned he did not deliberately stave people, heat waves and famines have nothing to do with Stalin. I require that Anarchists concern themselves with saving the Community from Police brutality.
Criticism first; on Uri Adiah the Councilman of National Affairs.
You consistently indulge in gossip, you need to stop that Uri.
Any time there is a rumor about anyone friend or foe you indulge in this gossip. And you consistently have with held your very best ideas from the rest of us.
To indulge in irresponsible criticism in private instead of actively putting forward one's suggestions to the organization. To say nothing to people to their faces but to gossip behind their backs, or to say nothing at a meeting but to gossip afterwards. To show no regard at all for the principles of collective life but to follow one's own inclination. This is a second type.
You are guilty of Liberalism Comrade, fix it.
Standing in Defense second; on Uri Adiah the Councilman of National Affairs.
More people need to listen to on the issues of Syrian and Kurdish conflicts, none of us even dare to get the correct answer, you have taken the correct view and made it clear it is complex and what are the ways out, we need to follow your line on this.
Criticism first; on Miriam Emesberg the Councilwoman of Education.
You pride yourself on your vast knowledge which you do have it, and you do have this. But you also try to de-secularize everyone forgetting that this is not a religious organization. Strange as you are an Atheist, it is true that an Agnostic or an Atheist may have religiosity. But I get the feeling that you do this as cover for avoiding harder work, not because you are lazy but because you are afraid others will question your prime vast knowledge.
To regard oneself as having rendered great service to the revolution, to pride oneself on being a veteran, to disdain minor assignments while being quite unequal to major tasks, to be slipshod in work and slack in study. This is a tenth type.
Stop shutting us down when we demand a fact check or for you to research something for one of us if we are having trouble understanding a subject or have not the time to study, you are good at study and can outmatch us all so it takes nothing from you.
Standing in Defense second; on Miriam Emesberg the Councilwoman of Education.
Several of us are guilty of ignoring you, we need to stop this.
You honestly would not have the issues you have if you had more solidarity from the rest of us. We have all been busy and that has made things difficult, this is not an excuse and I think we have made it such without admitting it, I am sorry. I will do all I can to end that.
Criticism first; on Hannah Toff the Councilwoman of Strategic Projects.
You are stubborn hot headed and overly aggressive, if I was younger I would be able to keep up but I'm not so young anymore. You make a lot of rash decisions out of nowhere, you need to think about the revolution and how your actions may cost us and you.
Not to obey orders but to give pride of place to one's own opinions. To demand special consideration from the organization but to reject its discipline. This is a fourth type.
I need to remind you that the Bund Council Staff must follow the orders of the three higher offices; the Cleric, the Emissary, and the Chairman.
Standing in Defense second; on Hannah Toff the Councilwoman of Strategic Projects.
Without you, I would be dead, Comrade Net would be dead, Uri would be dead, Dona would also be dead. You are a hero Hannah Toff, you are also rather brilliant. Your strategies and the projects you have designed for strategy are unspeakably better than much of the United States military.
Criticism first; on Marvin Eliyahu the Councilman of World Forums.
I understand that you and Uri Adiah are best friends and roommates but you don't have to always be so unprofessional, I am referring to your tolerance of Uri's gossiping.
To see someone harming the interests of the masses and yet not feel indignant, or dissuade or stop him or reason with him, but to allow him to continue. This is an eighth type.
I can tell that the gossip bothers you Marvin, so why let it continue, in times like that you may be the only one he will give listening ears.
Standing in Defense second; on Marvin Eliyahu the Councilman of World Forums.
You have become a master at dialectical materialism.
I disowned every member of the Mesa Maoist Network after they refused to engage in dialectics with you, they exposed themselves as typical eurocentric Communists. Everything you said was correct, if they were so correct they should have been able to answer you with a counter but they refused. Sometimes you are just correct and people need to get over it. I was very happy to disown them, even the Black members are inwardly chauvinistic, trust my words on this.
Now that this is taken care of we need to understand that dialectical materialism in the context of Marxism-Leninism can allow for National-Cultural Autonomy. But this can only be known if you study the correct writings. There is a lot to go through, so let me mention three favorites of mine to start off with.
Capitalism Plus Dope Equals Genocide by Michael Cetewayo Tabor.
The Basis of Black Power by Stokely Carmichael.
Quotations from Mao Tse Tung.
After reading these it still will be hard to understand how Marxism-Leninism can allow for National-Cultural Autonomy and that is why we are writing a Manifesto. Again, I refuse to call myself a Marxist-Leninist because for me this would be inherently dishonest. Modern Bundism actually falls into the category of Pantherism, I am proud to have helped us bring us to that realization.
No comments:
Post a Comment