Bundist Movement

Bundist Movement
Jewish NOT Zionist

Thursday, April 11, 2019

The Syrian War: Confusing Subject

By Uri Adiah 


The truth about what is actually going on in Syria can be a very confusing subject.
I know a lot about Syria I have been there many times, I hope to see Syria again
This article is not finessed
This article is not finessed
This article is not finessed

Wednesday, April 10, 2019

Detention and Torture in the Jordan Valley

                                                             
                                                                    


Call back to when we did this Article:                                                                 
https://bundistmovement.blogspot.com/2016/05/international-declaration-of-opposition.html
We apologize for never getting back to it, but here is something more up to date. 


                                                              2019-04-06
    Three days ago the Canadian citizen Dr abraham Weizfeld PhD was released from a day and night of torture at the hands of Israel’s occupation military in the Jordan Valley of Palestine. Dr Weizfeld is a resident in the Palestinian city of Nablus (Sukim/Shrem) in the north of the West Bank who came to join in a walk through the valley on the way to Israel’s colony or settlement of Ma’ale Efrayim, close to the Jordan border. The stretch of land crossed over is planned to be closed off and then annexed  to create a continuous series of settlements from East Jerusalem to the Jordan border, thus cutting off the north from the south of the West Bank.

  The eight people detained were five Palestinians, two Italian internationals and the Jewish-Palestinian Dr. Weizfeld. One Palestinian woman, Ghadeer Abu Zina, remains imprisoned. These 26 hours though do not compare to the years of detention for thousands of Palestinians presently. The detention and torture of a Jewish academic with Canadian citizenship points out the purely ideological nature of the State of Israel which otherwise claims to act on behalf of the Jewish People. The national chauvinism of Israel’s political culture is actually oriented to the State and not the Jewish people, who are subject to the antisemitism of the self-proclaimed supporters of the State of Israel. Jewish-Canadians or Jewish-Americans adhere to their countries of residence as their homeland equally with other residents and citizens. The Zionist ideology proclaims that such countries, which contain a majority of the world’s Jewish people, are not their homeland and that they should leave and come to Israel their one and only homeland, much the same way as the antisemitic populist wave of ‘White’ Christian Supremacists proclaim.
                 
              The detention and torture of this Jewish Canadian, and now Palestinian,
demonstrates that the Israel State and its forces respect no rule of law and operate as a
dictatorship over the occupied Palestinian People. Neither International Law, nor Israel law
and not even Jewish law is respected by the famed Tzahal military forces of Israel which
continue the targeted killings of demonstrating Palestinians on the frontier of Gaza and
permit Zionist settlers to kill their Palestinian neighbours with impunity.

   To contact Dr abraham Weizfeld PhD;
        saalaha@fokus.name
        +970 569 538 169  [WhatsUp]

                                   

                                    Détention et torture dans la vallée du Jourdain
                                                     Communiqué de presse
                                                                  2019-04-06


        Il y a trois jours, le citoyen canadien Abraham Weizfeld, PhD, a été libéré après une journée et une nuit de torture aux mains de l'armée d'occupation d’Israël dans la vallée du Jourdain en Palestine. Le Dr Weizfeld est un résident de la ville palestinienne de Naplouse (Sukim / Shrem) au nord de la Cisjordanie qui est venu se joindre à une promenade dans la vallée sur le chemin menant à la colonie israélienne de Ma’ale Efrayim, près de la frontière avec la Jordanie. La bande de terre traversée devait être fermée puis annexée afin de créer une série contigüe de colonies de peuplement allant de Jérusalem-Est à la frontière avec la Jordanie, séparant ainsi le nord du sud de la Cisjordanie.

    Les huit personnes arrêtées de la marche étaient cinq Palestiniens, deux internationaux italiens et le Dr. juif-palestinien Weizfeld. Une femme palestinienne, Ghadeer Abu Zina, est toujours emprisonnée. Ces 26 heures ne sont cependant pas comparables aux années de détention touchant des milliers de Palestiniens à l’heure actuelle. La détention et la torture d'un universitaire juif de citoyenneté canadienne mettent en évidence la nature purement idéologique de l'État d'Israël, qui prétend par ailleurs agir au nom du peuple juif. Le chauvinisme national de la culture politique d’Israël est en réalité axé sur l’État et non sur le peuple juif, qui est soumis à l’antisémitisme des partisans autoproclamés pour l’État d’Israël. Les juifs canadiens ou juifs américains adhèrent à leur pays de résidence comme à leur patrie, à égalité avec les autres résidents et citoyen-nes. L'idéologie sioniste proclame que ces pays, qui regroupent la majorité du peuple juif du monde, ne sont pas leur patrie et qu'ils devraient attribuer à Israël leur seule fonction patrie, à peu près de la même manière que la vague populiste antisémite 'White' suprémacistes chrétiens le proclament.

    La détention et la torture de ce Canadien juif, et maintenant palestinien, démontrent que l'État d’Israël et ses forces ne respectent aucune règle de droit et fonctionnent comme une dictature sur le peuple palestinien occupé. Ni le droit international, ni la loi israélienne ni même la loi juive ne sont pas respectées par les célèbres forces militaires Tzahal qui poursuivent les assassinats ciblés de Palestiniens manifestants à la frontière de Gaza et permettent aux colons sionistes de tuer leurs voisins palestinien-nes en toute impunité.

 Pour contacter le Dr Abraham Weizfeld PhD;
             saalaha@fokus.name
       +970 569 538 169 [WhatsUp]



                                                                                                   









Monday, April 8, 2019

I have something to say in respect to Miriam Emesberg

 By Hannah Toff




I have something to say in respect to Miriam Emesberg.
I disagree with her on the notion that masculinism ought to replace feminism.
Egalitarianism ought to replace feminism. First I give context to what I am referring to:
http://bundistmovement.blogspot.com/2019/04/torah-culture-and-rejection-of-april.html
I hold no ill will towards masculinists like Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua and Miriam Emesberg. Although I find Miriam Emesberg to be a bit extreme in her masculinism. I too oppose feminism, and I do my best to convince Classical feminists to switch over to egalitarianism. Miriam Emesberg is correct on her historical analysis concerning how historically revisionist and eurocentric the entire feminist line truly is. Those who reject how eurocentric and historically revisionist the femenist claims are need to read White Women's Rights by Louise Michele Newman and pay close attention to the videos by Citalli. Citalli used to be one of the primary spokeswomen of the Mexica Movement. What is funny to me is that Miriam Emesberg is an Atheist who finds Modernism to be a eurocentric assimilationist attack on Torah Culture, and it is. However the terms techno-Patriarchy to describe masculinism and techno-Matriarchy to describe feminism could be confusing to those who do not understand that she is using the term techno to describe technological, she is pushing a theological position. The standard in the "Modern World" not referring to "Modernism" should be egalitarianism, masculinism should be a right for the Jewish Orthodox but not as standard enforced all Non-Orthodox Jewry. I am aware that that genuine masculinism does not strip women of rights, I understand that it merely gives Women different rights than the rights of Men. Miriam seems to forget that many Women are just like her, having a solid need to be a house wife. But She forgets that there are also a lot of Women like me that would rather have identical rights to Men, and even Men who have a need to have the same rights that house wives have. I don't make the historical revisionist claims that Women have always been oppressed by Men, but this still happened as Miriam pointed out in both Europe and China. Black feminism was necessary because for a time Black Men emulated the White system of Male Chauvinism, and to me that is where Classical feminism came from, and it is not necessary any more, Black Men have it much worse than Black Women and only the most disconnected fail to see that, all a Black Man has to do is smile and he gets accused of rape. 
But if we are to free the Diaspora from eurocentricity then we need an egalitarian standard that allows traditionalist women to promote masculinism is a social context while living under the overarching system of egalitarianism. Male Chauvinism has polluted Patriarchy in every way it can. Fighting this pollution requires flexibility. I am not sure if I have made clear that I am Jewish Conservative, I am not Orthodox. Maybe I did not make clear that I reject Jewish Conservative conversions, all Jewish
conversions must be Orthodox if they are to be authentic. So this means I would fight any and all attempts at taking away the traditional system away from Orthodox Jewry, but I am to independent to be Orthodox and Miriam is an Atheist as traditional as she is the Orthodox would never except her atheist stances in fact they will be much more understanding to abraham Weizfeld's Agnostic point of view and for the most part they are. It is never a surprise to me that Jewish Agnostics like abraham Weizfeld are always more observant than Jewish Atheists like Miriam Emesberg, what is perplexing to me is how someone like Miriam Emesberg can be so deep into archaic traditions, at least it makes sense why Comrade Net believes in those archaic traditions Net is mystically minded not scientific.
Ironically Comrade Net seems more respectful towards scientific points of view and he so respectful to scientists that they tend to be respectful towards his mystical points of view. It is funny to me because actually I do understand Comrade Net's esoteric mystical stances they very material and non-idealist, it hurts to me that Net can understand science better than Miriam can.  
I stand by my stance on egalitarianism over masculinism.
Overarching egalitarianism would respect a Community's masculinism.
Overarching masculinism would never respect a Community's egalitarianism.
I would say to Miriam Emesberg my Comrade and political big Sister, you are good at history but you need to think more scientific.

Monday, April 1, 2019

Torah Culture and Rejection of April Fool's Day

By Miriam Emesberg

April Fool's Day is a hollow day, it is not ceremonial and it holds no use. April Fool's Day is a day that should be rejected by those Jewish and non-Jewish alike. On my trip to the office I was spray painted by a passerby who yelled "April Fools Day" and I think it is the duty of the Jewish People to stand up and be the Joy Killers in this Society. We must end the emphasis on the repulsive and ugly colonialist traditions.  Dona Newman gave me new clothes to wear and that is very kind of her but that was my favorite shirt. Anyway I need to write about what happened to us Friday.
March 29, 2019 everything was nice, Isaiah P. Kamatstein accompanied me to the office.
We met up with Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua and Dona Newman.
We went to the Jamba Juice and we sat on a bench discussing some basic plans, within these plans is how to safely get Daniel Miller here in a way that is not to rough for him or us.
We are also coming up with plans to remove the ban that the Department of Homeland Security has against Dr. Weizfeld. Comrade Net and Dona both in great detail explained some plans.
Isaiah P. Kamatstein had invited us to his Wedding, his boyfriend proposed to him on Thursday March 28 and Isaiah had said yes. Everything that day was perfect, I was happy.
But then came Jared Eighty-Eight, a Neo-Nazi Terrorist who has connections to the Phoenix Police. He came right up to us and he said "I'm going to fucking kill you ugly Jews." then he said "Did you get the letters from my friends Dona?", and no, I don't know what Jared Eighty-Eight's real name is.
We were in a public place so Jared Eighty-Eight could not make good on his threats.
I am very familiar with Jared Eighty-Eight and his Whore Bunny Leistung.
Just to be clear I don't know Bunny Leistung's real name. 
But I do know that Bunny Leistung is a feminist.
I am sick of the eurocentric historical revisions of history that claim that Patriarchy is harmful to Women. I am fed up with the notion that Women like myself must be transphobic if we except that gender roles are organic. 

Bunny Leistung is not a deviation from feminism, the fact that she is a White Supremacist shows that she represents feminism whereas anti-racists can never represent feminism. 

The Old World is Africa, Asia and Europe.
The Old World was kept in tact by the organic Patriarchy that organically placed Women in the role of ruler of the House and Men as head to Women.
Within the organic system of Patriarchy there are both Patriarchs and Matriarchs.
Within the artificial system of Matriarchy, Men are only sperm donors.   

Historical revisionists try to make the claim that Sexual Equality was practiced under Matriarchy.
Sexual Equality is Egalitarian not Matriarchy, Sexual Equality was practiced under Egalitarianism.
In truth Egalitarianism was practiced in the New World not the Old World. 

The New World is Australia, New Zealand, and the Americas.  
The system of Egalitarianism was prevalent in the Americas. 
In the Americas the system of Egalitarianism was seen as offensive to the Male Chauvinistic Europe.
Europe became more set apart from both Africa and Asia.
But of course, China would suffer from parallel problems seen because of its Emperor system.
It was primitive Totalitarianism that brought Male Chauvinism to China.
But in the case of Europe, it was a failed attempt at Egalitarianism that paved the way for Male Chauvinism. Feminism is techno-
Matriarchy, although eurocentric revisions of history would make this seem untrue, it is still none the less true to say that Feminism is techno-Matriarchy and that an attempt at techno-Patriarchy should be made. The greatest victims of feminism are not Men, the greatest victims of feminism are Women like myself. I explained in my previous article on this blog that my goal is revenge. 

Masculinism as the cure to Feminism and Male Chauvinism.
If I could give birth then I would not be politically active, I would even be telling both Dona Newman and Hannah Toff to find husbands and stop giving into assimilation by taking up Men's work. Masculinism is techno-Patriarchy and we should attempt to bring it into practice. 
Masculinism is the cure to both feminism and Male Chauvinism. But sadly Male Chauvinism and misogyny get deliberately mislabeled as hyper Masculinity and Men's Liberation, and everyone is to cowardly to call this a sexist psychological trick, even though that is what this is.
It was Bunny Leistung who led the Women's Power and Prostitution March in Glendale, Arizona last November, if anyone is wondering why the News Cameras shunned the event, because it must never be known that feminism is tied in to White Supremacy and Female Exploitation, or more accurately it must never be remembered that feminism in origin is part of white Supremacy.   
Don't forget the pact between the KKK, Prohibition, and Women's Liberation in the 1920s.
Feminism is liberal and reactionary. 

April Fools Day is actually a holiday for an April Fool.

That is why April Fools Day is actually April Fool's Day.
The holiday for any given April Fool is a stupid tradition of the First World Nation-States.
The April Fool's Day is contrary to the Torah Culture.
The Torah Culture is about welcoming the stranger.
The Torah Culture is about probation not slavery.
The Torah Culture is about Justice and Peace.
Torah Culture must reject the sickness of the April Fool's Day.
No one should have to worry about getting spray painted on the way to work.
No one should have to worry about getting pranked randomly.
Torah Culture is at odds with the April Fool's Day.

Thursday, March 28, 2019

Revolution Now!

By: Isaiah P. Kamatstein 


We need to study the old Jewish Labour Bund and the original Black Panther party if we are to succeed at overthrowing Zionism.



But as I see with both Black eyes and Jewish eyes.
I must warn everyone that the Liberalism by today's Young Blacks creates a disconnect between Blacks and the Third World. The Liberalism of European Jewry during the Civil Rights movement has a lot to do with why and how the Black Panther party got destroyed by COINTELPRO. It is good that the European Jewry stood with Martin Luther King Jr. and yet it needs to be asked why European Jewry did not stand with Malcolm X the same way and praise his criticisms of Zionism? Why couldn't European Jewry start the Bundist Movement back when the Black Panthers started a Rainbow Coalition? Obviously the European Jewish Ultra-Orthodox are not political, so it is not to them that I am addressing these questions. Fred Hampton was the greatest Black Panther who ever lived he started the Rainbow Coalition which in Bundist words would be called a United Front. The Rainbow Coalition was a coalition active in the late 1960s and early 1970s, founded in Chicago, Illinois by Fred Hampton of the revolutionary Black Panther party, along with William "Preacherman" Fesperman, Jack (Junebug) Boykin, Bobby Joe Mcginnis and Hy Thurman of the Young Patriots Organization and the founder of the Young Lords as a civil and human rights movement Jose Cha Cha Jimenez. It later expanded to include various ethnic socialist groups and community groups like the Lincoln Park Poor People's Coalition. It was associated with the rising Black Power movement. Had there been a Bundist Movement back then to join such a (United Front) Rainbow Coalition the ideology of Zionism and the State of Israel would not have existed anymore, Jewish Blacks could have united with Jewish Africans and Jewish Europeans and this would have dispelled the fictions of Jewish ethnicity. Such a Bundist Movement could have helped the Black Panthers understand that they were practicing National-Cultural Autonomy. In those days America was prideful of World War II and that could have been used to expose COINTELPRO with out it leaking or even needing to be declassified. We need a United Front today and we need to model it after the Rainbow Coalition. We should not use the words Rainbow Coalition because several Liberals call their alliances this.

January 28, 2019 Amber goes to work.
She leaves after a 5:30 p.m. meeting.
She tells her coworkers that she is not feeling well.
6:30 p.m. Amber Evans goes to a local store where she buys cold medicine and a Snickers bar.
The store’s security footage shows Amber leaving the store, she is missing for several days.
Her dead body is found in an Ohio River on March 25, 2019.
Black people need to do what the original Black Panther party did, bear arms and ditch nonviolence, any one of us in the Bundist Movement could be murdered in the same way that she was, but this will be harder to do when we have more arms and bigger press, sadly this is dependent on us not getting censored, this is an uphill battle.

Let us start Revolution NOW! 
To start it let revolutionize ourselves, we start by investigating how to Combat Liberalism.


COMBAT LIBERALISM: September 7, 1937 - By Mao Tse-tung.


We stand for active ideological struggle because it is the weapon for ensuring unity within the Party and the revolutionary organizations in the interest of our fight. Every Communist and revolutionary should take up this weapon. But liberalism rejects ideological struggle and stands for unprincipled peace, thus giving rise to a decadent, Philistine attitude and bringing about political degeneration in certain units and individuals in the Party and the revolutionary organizations. Liberalism manifests itself in various ways.

To let things slide for the sake of peace and friendship when a person has clearly gone wrong, and refrain from principled argument because he is an old acquaintance, a fellow townsman, a schoolmate, a close friend, a loved one, an old colleague or old subordinate. Or to touch on the matter lightly instead of going into it thoroughly, so as to keep on good terms. The result is that both the organization and the individual are harmed. This is one type of liberalism. 

To indulge in irresponsible criticism in private instead of actively putting forward one's suggestions to the organization. To say nothing to people to their faces but to gossip behind their backs, or to say nothing at a meeting but to gossip afterwards. To show no regard at all for the principles of collective life but to follow one's own inclination. This is a second type. 

To let things drift if they do not affect one personally; to say as little as possible while knowing perfectly well what is wrong, to be worldly wise and play safe and seek only to avoid blame. This is a third type. 

Not to obey orders but to give pride of place to one's own opinions. To demand special consideration from the organization but to reject its discipline. This is a fourth type. 

To indulge in personal attacks, pick quarrels, vent personal spite or seek revenge instead of entering into an argument and struggling against incorrect views for the sake of unity or progress or getting the work done properly. This is a fifth type. 

To hear incorrect views without rebutting them and even to hear counter-revolutionary remarks without reporting them, but instead to take them calmly as if nothing had happened. This is a sixth type. 

To be among the masses and fail to conduct propaganda and agitation or speak at meetings or conduct investigations and inquiries among them, and instead to be indifferent to them and show no concern for their well-being, forgetting that one is a Communist and behaving as if one were an ordinary non-Communist. This is a seventh type. 

To see someone harming the interests of the masses and yet not feel indignant, or dissuade or stop him or reason with him, but to allow him to continue. This is an eighth type. 

To work half-heartedly without a definite plan or direction; to work perfunctorily and muddle along--"So long as one remains a monk, one goes on tolling the bell." This is a ninth type. 

To regard oneself as having rendered great service to the revolution, to pride oneself on being a veteran, to disdain minor assignments while being quite unequal to major tasks, to be slipshod in work and slack in study. This is a tenth type. 

To be aware of one's own mistakes and yet make no attempt to correct them, taking a liberal attitude towards oneself. This is an eleventh type. 

We could name more. But these eleven are the principal types.
They are all manifestations of liberalism.
Liberalism is extremely harmful in a revolutionary collective. It is a corrosive which eats away unity, undermines cohesion, causes apathy and creates dissension. It robs the revolutionary ranks of compact organization and strict discipline, prevents policies from being carried through and alienates the Party organizations from the masses which the Party leads. It is an extremely bad tendency.
Liberalism stems from petty-bourgeois selfishness, it places personal interests first and the interests of the revolution second, and this gives rise to ideological, political and organizational liberalism.
People who are liberals look upon the principles of Marxism as abstract dogma. They approve of Marxism, but are not prepared to practice it or to practice it in full; they are not prepared to replace their liberalism by Marxism. These people have their Marxism, but they have their liberalism as well--they talk Marxism but practice liberalism; they apply Marxism to others but liberalism to themselves. They keep both kinds of goods in stock and find a use for each. This is how the minds of certain people work.
Liberalism is a manifestation of opportunism and conflicts fundamentally with Marxism. It is negative and objectively has the effect of helping the enemy; that is why the enemy welcomes its preservation in our midst. Such being its nature, there should be no place for it in the ranks of the revolution.
We must use Marxism, which is positive in spirit, to overcome liberalism, which is negative. A Communist should have largeness of mind and he should be staunch and active, looking upon the interests of the revolution as his very life and subordinating his personal interests to those of the revolution; always and everywhere he should adhere to principle and wage a tireless struggle against all incorrect ideas and actions, so as to consolidate the collective life of the Party and strengthen the ties between the Party and the masses; he should be more concerned about the Party and the masses than about any private person, and more concerned about others than about himself. Only thus can he be considered a Communist.
All loyal, honest, active and upright Communists must unite to oppose the liberal tendencies shown by certain people among us, and set them on the right path. This is one of the tasks on our ideological front. 

 Next I explain who and what is the Bund Council Staff.

The Bund Council Staff consists of:

MYSELF: Isaiah P. Kamatstein – Councilman of Committees
Uri Adiah – Councilman of National Affairs
Miriam Emesberg – Councilwoman of Education
Hannah Toff – Councilwoman of Strategic Projects
Marvin Eliyahu – Councilman of World Forums

MYSELF the Councilman of Committees -
The purpose of the Councilman of Committees is to form political committees between the Bundist Movement and larger groups that are necessary yet hard to achieve in dialogue and relations. Now our context of committee an alliance congress between the Bundist Movement and such a group, usually in the context of religion and non-national gatherings.
The main Committees I work to form are;
LGBT Committee.
Catholic Church Committee.
Muslim Committee.
Orthodox Church Committee.
New Community Mafia Committee.

Uri Adiah the Councilman of National Affairs -
There are two purposes of the Councilman of National Affairs.
The first is to form strong ties between the Jewish Nation and other Nationalities. The second is to evaluate the National information based on the material conditions accordingly both peoplehood and geopolitical factors.

Miriam Emesberg the Councilwoman of Education -
The purpose of the Councilwoman of Education is to provide Jewish education in both academic and mythological terms to the Jewish Vanguard, always in a cultural context sometimes in a religious context. The Councilwoman of Education is to safeguard the Jewish Community from Modernist Secular Conformity. The Councilwoman of Education is to dispel right-wing propaganda, leftist populist deception, centrist liberalism, euroeccentric historical revisionism prevalent in Capitalist, Communist, and Fascist doctrines. It is also the duty of the Councilwoman of Education to be educated in the matters of Civil Rights struggles, revolutionary struggles, and reformation movements and then teach it to the Vanguard so that this is passed on to the broader Jewish Community.

Hannah Toff the Councilwoman of Strategic Projects -
The purpose of the Councilwoman of Strategic Projects is to find the correct strategies needed for legal deterrence against hostile police forces. She must have a knowledge of weapons, and law in the use of those weapons.

Marvin Eliyahu the Councilman of World Forums -
The purpose of the Councilman of World Forums is to literally start World Forums, this is the most non-religious office within the entire
Bund Council Staff, the matter of World Forums deals with Countries, Territories, and World Political Organizations, not Nations. But sometimes Nations have Countries so the office of World Forums does work in close connection to the office of National Affairs. 


Criticism first; on MYSELF the Councilman of Committees.
It took me to long to approach these issues, and I hope that we will not waste to much time anymore. I saw issues and I ignored them for a long time.

To let things slide for the sake of peace and friendship when a person has clearly gone wrong, and refrain from principled argument because he is an old acquaintance, a fellow townsman, a schoolmate, a close friend, a loved one, an old colleague or old subordinate. Or to touch on the matter lightly instead of going into it thoroughly, so as to keep on good terms. The result is that both the organization and the individual are harmed. This is one type of liberalism.

I am guilty of Liberalism, and I hope that I have fixed this.
Every time I go along to get along, I harm us all, I fear being accused of arrogance. My fears hold us back, I will work harder to not stray in fear of attack.  I will do my best to not error like this ever again. 


Standing in Defense second; on MYSELF the Councilman of Committees.
I get wrongfully attacked by Anarchists for pointing out their historical failings in reply to them when they make populist propaganda. I do not attack Anarchists nor do I go out of my way to slander them, it is strange that I get attacked for "Pro-Stalinist ideas" I do not call myself Marxist-Leninist, but sure I absorb much of it. Yet many Anarchists will use Black Panthers to justify things to me forgetting that they where not in anyway Anarchist.
We take in Emma Goldman's Syndicalism: the Modern Menace to Capitalism very seriously, so we are not opposed to every Anarchist idea, but Anarchism it self is more historically revisionist than Marxism. As far as Joseph Stalin is concerned he did not deliberately stave people, heat waves and famines have nothing to do with Stalin. I require that Anarchists concern themselves with saving the Community from Police brutality. 


Criticism first; on Uri Adiah the Councilman of National Affairs.
You consistently indulge in gossip, you need to stop that Uri.
Any time there is a rumor about anyone friend or foe you indulge in this gossip. And you consistently have with held your very best ideas from the rest of us.

To indulge in irresponsible criticism in private instead of actively putting forward one's suggestions to the organization. To say nothing to people to their faces but to gossip behind their backs, or to say nothing at a meeting but to gossip afterwards. To show no regard at all for the principles of collective life but to follow one's own inclination. This is a second type.

You are guilty of Liberalism Comrade, fix it.

Standing in Defense second; on Uri Adiah the Councilman of National Affairs.
More people need to listen to on the issues of Syrian and Kurdish conflicts, none of us even dare to get the correct answer, you have taken the correct view and made it clear it is complex and what are the ways out, we need to follow your line on this. 



Criticism first; on Miriam Emesberg the Councilwoman of Education.
You pride yourself on your vast knowledge which you do have it, and you do have this. But you also try to de-secularize everyone forgetting that this is not a religious organization. Strange as you are an Atheist, it is true that an Agnostic or an Atheist may have religiosity. But I get the feeling that you do this as cover for avoiding harder work, not because you are lazy but because you are afraid others will question your prime vast knowledge.

To regard oneself as having rendered great service to the revolution, to pride oneself on being a veteran, to disdain minor assignments while being quite unequal to major tasks, to be slipshod in work and slack in study. This is a tenth type.

Stop shutting us down when we demand a fact check or for you to research something for one of us if we are having trouble understanding a subject or have not the time to study, you are good at study and can outmatch us all so it takes nothing from you.

Standing in Defense second; on Miriam Emesberg the Councilwoman of Education.
Several of us are guilty of ignoring you, we need to stop this.
You honestly would not have the issues you have if you had more solidarity from the rest of us. We have all been busy and that has made things difficult, this is not an excuse and I think we have made it such without admitting it, I am sorry. I will do all I can to end that. 



Criticism first; on Hannah Toff the Councilwoman of Strategic Projects.
You are stubborn hot headed and overly aggressive, if I was younger I would be able to keep up but I'm not so young anymore. You make a lot of rash decisions out of nowhere, you need to think about the revolution and how your actions may cost us and you. 

Not to obey orders but to give pride of place to one's own opinions. To demand special consideration from the organization but to reject its discipline. This is a fourth type.

I need to remind you that the Bund Council Staff must follow the orders of the three higher offices; the Cleric, the Emissary, and the Chairman. 

Standing in Defense second; on Hannah Toff the Councilwoman of Strategic Projects.
Without you, I would be dead, Comrade Net would be dead, Uri would be dead, Dona would also be dead. You are a hero Hannah Toff, you are also rather brilliant. Your strategies and the projects you have designed for strategy are unspeakably better than much of the United States military. 


Criticism first; on Marvin Eliyahu the Councilman of World Forums.
I understand that you and Uri Adiah are best friends and roommates but you don't have to always be so unprofessional, I am referring to your tolerance of Uri's gossiping.

To see someone harming the interests of the masses and yet not feel indignant, or dissuade or stop him or reason with him, but to allow him to continue. This is an eighth type.
I can tell that the gossip bothers you Marvin, so why let it continue, in times like that you may be the only one he will give listening ears.

Standing in Defense second; on Marvin Eliyahu the Councilman of World Forums.
You have become a master at dialectical materialism.
I disowned every member of the Mesa Maoist Network after they refused to engage in dialectics with you, they exposed themselves as typical eurocentric Communists. Everything you said was correct, if they were so correct they should have been able to answer you with a counter but they refused. Sometimes you are just correct and people need to get over it. I was very happy to disown them, even the Black members are inwardly chauvinistic, trust my words on this. 


Now that this is taken care of we need to understand that dialectical materialism in the context of Marxism-Leninism can allow for National-Cultural Autonomy. But this can only be known if you study the correct writings. There is a lot to go through, so let me mention three favorites of mine to start off with.

Capitalism Plus Dope Equals Genocide by Michael Cetewayo Tabor.
The Basis of Black Power by Stokely Carmichael.
Quotations from Mao Tse Tung. 


After reading these it still will be hard to understand how Marxism-Leninism can allow for National-Cultural Autonomy and that is why we are writing a Manifesto. Again, I refuse to call myself a Marxist-Leninist because for me this would be inherently dishonest. Modern Bundism actually falls into the category of Pantherism, I am proud to have helped us bring us to that realization.   

Wednesday, March 27, 2019

Free the Diaspora with Proletarian Doikeit

By Isaiah Kamatstein 

 I am very fortunate that my Boyfriend's sister had the Money and shared interests for us to take a trip to Venezuela. My Boyfriend and I were able to take Uri Adiah and Marvin Eliyahu with us, so we did. We wanted to take Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua with us but he regrettably could not come with us it is strange to see the place is exactly how he said it would be. When we got back to America we were intercepted by U.S Intel and each of us were forced to sign a statement not to talk about much of the things we saw, we also had to sign a statement not mentioning which part of U.S Intel intercepted us upon our return to America. All of our pictures confiscated and all of our visual and audio recordings were erased, my Boyfriend is going to be pressing charges so maybe we can at least get the pictures back. I know what I can and can not say about Venezuela so I will keep it brief. Seeing how much the indigenous of Venezuela support Nicolás Maduro, and then coming back to America to see how much no one cares about them yet can care enough to support Juan Guaidó who only represents the colonial spanish Oligarchy along side their U.S Imperialist masters exposes White Privilege as being the blood of Capitalism. Venezuela has nothing to sell to the Global economy except for Oil, all the money goes to the  indigenous and mixed Peoples of Venezuela. America wishes to get that Venezuelan Oil cheaper with the help of Juan Guaidó. I think the strangest thing in Venezuela is that they have very Corporatized media, all the channels say bad things about Nicolás Maduro except for the Government channel.

The Jewish Nation is based on Culture and Religion.
The Black Nation is based on Culture and Ethnicity.

Not every Culture constitutes a Nation, however every Nation constitutes a Culture. This is necessary to say when explaining the Black Jewish connection. I'm not half Black because I struggle with the Black People just as much as did my father. I'm not half Jewish because there is no such thing. I am a Jewish Black. No person can hold two religions at the same time, any other such claims to the contrary are colonial. My father was a Black man, my mother is an Ashkenazi woman and she was born of a Jewish mother and passed it to me as is the cultural criteria for being raised Jewish. My father was a Jewish Black, there was no contradiction to that because Blackness is not dependent on religiosity, Jewishness is dependent on religiosity. Another factor is that religiosity is is not exclusive to religious observance.

The origin of Black Nationality started when people from the African Continent were sold to Europeans to work as chattel slaves. This Nation further developed through struggle with the aim of liberation that is still ongoing. But there is no White Nation, Whites can trace their lineage back to Europe without going to ancestry.com the same can not be said for Blacks. Europeans are born European but they are not born White, my mother may be European but that can never make me white as I do not benefit from Whiteness, ethnically I am half European and half African, but I am not an African in any sense of connection to African Nationality because Black Nationality stands apart. Not all Europeans are indoctrinated to be White and it is possible to shake off Whiteness.  It is possible for someone to have both African and Black Nationality, this is the case for Black South Africans, it is also the case for someone who has a Black parent and a North Afro-Arab parent. When an Arab Egyptian becomes a Citizen of the United States of America that person is by definition an African American and although such a person will encounter racism from Whites and possibly even Islamophobia that person will not have Black struggle that struggle will be Arab. The revolutionary Black Panther party were the political descendants of Malcolm X, founded by Huey P. Newton and Bobby Seale. Huey P. Newton brought Marxism-Leninism into the Black Panther party and this would evolve the foundation of today what we know as Pantherism. Huey P. Newton was neutralized and through drugs and COINTELPRO, but this does not discredit Pantherism, nor does this discredit the work and writings that Huey P. Newton laboured. The problem at hand has to do with turning Black forefathers into Black idols. Malcolm X, Huey P. Newton, and Bobby Seale are pillars to Blackness but they are not infallible saints, their mistakes do not reflect ideology. Blackness is not Afrocentric because, firstly because afrocentricity does not exist and secondly because Black Nationality is separate from African Culture, although still very much related and rooted to such.

The origin of Jewish Nationality was when Moses was handed the Torah on Mount Sinai, and it hardly matters as to whether or not this is a mere story because the Torah Culture is the foundation to Jewishness. Even the most non observant person who is Jewish has Judaism. The Jewish Religion is a Diaspora Religion, and the Jewish Culture is the Torah Culture. Judaism is not a philosophy, the desire for some to define Judaism as a philosophy is rooted in a reaction and/or need to keep colonized Jewish people from straying, this attempt causes even further colonization. National-Cultural Autonomy for the Jewish Nation means freeing the Diaspora from the control of Whiteness. Whiteness is the continuity of Western Christian Dominance.

The first step to freeing the Diaspora is to Combat Liberalism as described by Mao. 




COMBAT LIBERALISM by Mao Tse-tung September 7, 1937

We stand for active ideological struggle because it is the weapon for ensuring unity within the Party and the revolutionary organizations in the interest of our fight. Every Communist and revolutionary should take up this weapon.

But liberalism rejects ideological struggle and stands for unprincipled peace, thus giving rise to a decadent, Philistine attitude and bringing about political degeneration in certain units and individuals in the Party and the revolutionary organizations.
Liberalism manifests itself in various ways. 

To let things slide for the sake of peace and friendship when a person has clearly gone wrong, and refrain from principled argument because he is an old acquaintance, a fellow townsman, a schoolmate, a close friend, a loved one, an old colleague or old subordinate. Or to touch on the matter lightly instead of going into it thoroughly, so as to keep on good terms. The result is that both the organization and the individual are harmed. This is one type of liberalism. 

To indulge in irresponsible criticism in private instead of actively putting forward one's suggestions to the organization. To say nothing to people to their faces but to gossip behind their backs, or to say nothing at a meeting but to gossip afterwards. To show no regard at all for the principles of collective life but to follow one's own inclination. This is a second type. 

To let things drift if they do not affect one personally; to say as little as possible while knowing perfectly well what is wrong, to be worldly wise and play safe and seek only to avoid blame. This is a third type. 

Not to obey orders but to give pride of place to one's own opinions. To demand special consideration from the organization but to reject its discipline. This is a fourth type. 

To indulge in personal attacks, pick quarrels, vent personal spite or seek revenge instead of entering into an argument and struggling against incorrect views for the sake of unity or progress or getting the work done properly. This is a fifth type. 

To hear incorrect views without rebutting them and even to hear counter-revolutionary remarks without reporting them, but instead to take them calmly as if nothing had happened. This is a sixth type. 

To be among the masses and fail to conduct propaganda and agitation or speak at meetings or conduct investigations and inquiries among them, and instead to be indifferent to them and show no concern for their well-being, forgetting that one is a Communist and behaving as if one were an ordinary non-Communist. This is a seventh type. 

To see someone harming the interests of the masses and yet not feel indignant, or dissuade or stop him or reason with him, but to allow him to continue. This is an eighth type. 

To work half-heartedly without a definite plan or direction; to work perfunctorily and muddle along--"So long as one remains a monk, one goes on tolling the bell." This is a ninth type. 

To regard oneself as having rendered great service to the revolution, to pride oneself on being a veteran, to disdain minor assignments while being quite unequal to major tasks, to be slipshod in work and slack in study. This is a tenth type. 

To be aware of one's own mistakes and yet make no attempt to correct them, taking a liberal attitude towards oneself. This is an eleventh type. 

We could name more. But these eleven are the principal types.
They are all manifestations of liberalism. Liberalism is extremely harmful in a revolutionary collective. It is a corrosive which eats away unity, undermines cohesion, causes apathy and creates dissension. It robs the revolutionary ranks of compact organization and strict discipline, prevents policies from being carried through and alienates the Party organizations from the masses which the Party leads. It is an extremely bad tendency. Liberalism stems from petty-bourgeois selfishness, it places personal interests first and the interests of the revolution second, and this gives rise to ideological, political and organizational liberalism. People who are liberals look upon the principles of Marxism as abstract dogma. They approve of Marxism, but are not prepared to practice it or to practice it in full; they are not prepared to replace their liberalism by Marxism. These people have their Marxism, but they have their liberalism as well--they talk Marxism but practice liberalism; they apply Marxism to others but liberalism to themselves. They keep both kinds of goods in stock and find a use for each. This is how the minds of certain people work. Liberalism is a manifestation of opportunism and conflicts fundamentally with Marxism. It is negative and objectively has the effect of helping the enemy; that is why the enemy welcomes its preservation in our midst. Such being its nature, there should be no place for it in the ranks of the revolution. We must use Marxism, which is positive in spirit, to overcome liberalism, which is negative. A Communist should have largeness of mind and he should be staunch and active, looking upon the interests of the revolution as his very life and subordinating his personal interests to those of the revolution; always and everywhere he should adhere to principle and wage a tireless struggle against all incorrect ideas and actions, so as to consolidate the collective life of the Party and strengthen the ties between the Party and the masses; he should be more concerned about the Party and the masses than about any private person, and more concerned about others than about himself. Only thus can he be considered a Communist. All loyal, honest, active and upright Communists must unite to oppose the liberal tendencies shown by certain people among us, and set them on the right path. This is one of the tasks on our ideological front. 

The second step to freeing the Great Jewish Diaspora is to understand that we only have this revolutionary path because of the founders of the Bundist Movement. 

The founders of the Bundist Movement are:
abraham Weizfeld PhD the Chairman of the Revolution.
Dona Newman the Emissary of Solidarity.
Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua the Cleric of Public Relations.

The purpose of the Chairman of the Revolution is to make sure that the revolution is never criminalized, or at least to keep the Revolution legal long enough to gather strength in order to fight back against any coming Totalitarian takeover. The office of the Chairman must protect Jewish honor making him fundamentally at war with Zionism at all times.  

The purpose of the Emissary of Solidarity is organizational structure and to promote solidarity with the Jewish Vanguard and to promote and encourage Solidarity to the allies that most benefit the needs of the Jewish Proletariat. The office of the Emissary must be at odds with Americanism and disrupt attempts to be pacified by reforms even if this means to embrace new allies if other members show her that their Solidarity is true.  

The purpose of the Cleric of Public Relations is to function as good P.R for Bundism but in the more active matter he is to protect the reputation of esoteric matters such as cultural theocracy, mysticism, religiosity, and non-western traditionalism against the reactionary forces of cold science, secular supremacy, christian fundamentalism, and mystical forgery. The office of the Cleric is a position of Jewish Renewal for the Orthodox, the Reform, the Conservative, and the Reconstructionalist this means also that he must have a grasp of other religions and differing cultural norms. He must have a diplomatic tone to scientists, he must know how to unite scientists and mystics against the dangers of creation-science and mystic-charlatanism, but above all he must advocate for coexistence over the notion of communism. 

Now that I have gone over that, I am going to both criticize and take a stand in defense to the founders of the Bundist Movement.

On the Cleric of Public Relations, Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua.

Criticism first; no one understands us better than you, it is you who listen to us and have put forward our ideas to a more public forum. You are a pro at correcting myself, Miriam, Marvin, Hannah, and Uri.
So do you have such a hard time correcting both abraham Weizfeld and Dona Newman?

To hear incorrect views without rebutting them and even to hear counter-revolutionary remarks without reporting them, but instead to take them calmly as if nothing had happened. This is a sixth type.

Ironically that is the one most quoted by yourself, but can you apply it to yourself? I sure hope so. Are you intimidated by the fact that both Dr. Weizfeld and Ms. Newman are older than you? I have a hard time believing this because as for myself, Miriam, Marvin, and Uri we too are older than you, only Hannah is younger than you. You have no problem correcting us when you find any of us in error.

Standing in Defense second; I demand that the accusations thrown at Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua from time to time be put to an end.
Miriam could have defended Comrade Net last month when he was accused of being a Male Chauvinist, so what if Comrade Net is a Masculinist. His sex life also has nothing to do with his Masculinism, his womanizing addiction when in recovery from it or in relapse of have nothing to do with his Masculinism. Keep in mind that Miriam Emesberg is also a Masculinist and even more so than Comrade Net and no one would dare say that she is a male chauvinistic self-hating woman. Miriam is a traditional anti-feminist woman who would not be political if she was able to have children, we forget all the time that not every woman who hates feminism is a self-hating woman, Miriam is also an Atheist so you can not scapegoat her anti-feminism on theocracy, so why attack Comrade Net? Comrade Net has kept his sex life away from work and protected every Jewish woman in the Bundist Movement he has never denied his addiction to women, and I think we often forget that he is also a straight tomgirl and neglect to understand how many women have thrown themselves at him, I have seen this with my own eyes Niggas!!!  Comrade Net has protected women outside of the Jewish community as well. When in Venezuela I could hear both Marvin and Uri speculating as to whether or not Comrade Net is a Macho Chauvinist and I am addressing this now, Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua will even provide disclaimers about himself in fear that someone will hear the wrong things about him and then get the wrong idea, this is shameful. Marvin and Uri need to stop feeding the any notion that would give a misnomer of validity of this his rumor started from a political enemy who was a confirmed Neo-Nazi has anyone forgotten this? Comrade Net's wife is fully aware of his sexual addictions, and I never wanted this to be a public discussion but I refuse to let a rumor started by a Neo-Nazi destroy Comrade Net who also has protected me from Gay bashing, I have even enlisted his protection as of late because I'm getting to old to fight. When my previous Boyfriend was murdered the first person to ask me how I was holding up was Comrade Net. Gossip is against Judaism, never forget this.

On the Emissary of Solidarity, Dona Newman.

Criticism first; despite the progress you have made towards a new dialogue concerning the Christian communities throughout the World you still harbor emotional grudges towards the Church not distinguishing between the Eastern Church and the Western Church. You have been known to even block off conversations when Revolutionary Catholics of many types confront you. You have attacked the Trinity as unchristian even though non-Trinitarian Christianity is disingenuous to the entire Theological context of Christianity which is based in the Christian Bible it self. Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua who has the best grasp of the foundations of Christianity has pointed this out, Miriam Emesberg who has the strongest grip of history knows this and has even proven this to be the case. It is both populist and historical revisionist to attack the Council of Nicaea as elitist, pointing out how according to the Gospels Jesus never said he was divine does not explain away how he says he is one with that divinity, nor does it explain why Jesus praises Thomas for calling him divine. Now obviously we disagree with the Christian doctrine of the Trinity which is clearly based in the Christian Bible it self, but we also disagree with the Wiccan concept of the Trinity that they believe in, yet none of us would attack the beliefs of Wicca. You met the leaders of the Christian Socialist Front and admitted that their cause was essential for World Revolution then turned around the next day and made them the brunt of your jokes. Whenever our closest allies inquire about the Christian Socialist Front you pretend to not be as informed about this as you are. You show great Solidarity and a lack of prejudice, except when it comes to Christians regardless of what type although you have been gracious to Unitarian Christians who always end up plotting against us. Whenever Comrade Net or Miriam give you proof of a Catholic Community usually filled with people of multiethnic background, sometimes even having several African refugees within you fail to look into it.  

To be among the masses and fail to conduct propaganda and agitation or speak at meetings or conduct investigations and inquiries among them, and instead to be indifferent to them and show no concern for their well-being, forgetting that one is a Communist and behaving as if one were an ordinary non-Communist. This is a seventh type.
and of course we are socialist non-communists but the point in context is what it is 

Standing in Defense second; it is despicable how much several Marxist allies accuse Dona Newman of being a reactionary for pointing out that Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels had been historical revisionists grounded in eurocentricity, she is correct whenever she points this out. Dona Newman utilizes both Marx and Engels when ever it is correct to do so. There are so many linear eurocentric claims made by Marx and Engels that it cripples dialectical materialism it is not historically revisionist to alter dialectical materialism when an incorrect line is being pushed. Her support of the Mexica Movement is also correct, it does not matter that they are nonviolent, as loyal citizens to whatever Country we live in we need to translate this in revolutionary terms and by this we know that our loyalty is to the indigenous of this Continent. We are for self-defense instead of nonviolence as we owe a debt as Jewry in the first World and we expect a debt payed to us, but this also means we are to protect the nonviolent. Dona Newman is not incorrect to push the line that the Mexica Movement is the Vanguard of the indigenous activists regardless if they recognize their own Socialism or not.   



On the Chairman of the Revolution, abraham Weizfeld PhD.

Criticism first; let me start by saying that I know full well that Muammar Gaddafi became a disconnected fool who at times was reactionary, I even know about the fascists that he let into his Country, and I know this not just because Marvin Eliyahu told me about it, I know because my Boyfriend is Libyan. You have made public statements saying that the people of Libya supported NATO, but this is not true. No one in Libya except counter-intelligence agents supported NATO. When Gaddafi lied about many things, it was wrong. But the outcome of what happened to Libya as a result of Imperialist invasion is wrong. Now I know that you support the program of Jamahiriya and that you even have improved versions of this in mind, I know that you are a supporter of Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, I am your biggest Comrade in that regards. But you need to make corrections to things you have publicly said that I suspect of being emotional rather than reasonable. You should admit that you were mistaken to support the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi as I know that you do not like the outcome of what has resulted from that Imperialist invasion.

To indulge in personal attacks, pick quarrels, vent personal spite or seek revenge instead of entering into an argument and struggling against incorrect views for the sake of unity or progress or getting the work done properly. This is a fifth type. 

Another criticism I make is that you don't call yourself Palestinian, I would have hoped that Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua would have convinced you to say that you are a Palestinian. As you are fully aware Dr. Weizfeld you can have more than one National identity.
You do more than just live with Palestinians, they let you speak for them, something they never let a non-Palestinian do. Do you realize that they consider you to be Palestinian? You are a Jewish Palestinian! I really wish you could come see us in Arizona Chairman Weizfeld because dare I say it I am positive I could talk to you man to man and we would have a lot in common in the Inter-National struggle. You are Jewish. You are Palestinian. That is a good thing, the original Neturei Karta were also Jewish Palestinians and let us not forget that you know the Samaritans and their cultural history is tied to Jewish history. You are a Jewish Palestinian, learn more Arabic and own it.

Standing in Defense second; I would like to make clear that none of us support Bernie Sanders for President. Now that being said I am going to defend the cause of abraham Weizfeld pushing for us to vote for Bernie Sanders. That is not reactionary or revisionist of him in any way. I know that all five of us of the Bund Council Staff had been relieved when Dona Newman came out saying that she like the rest of us would not vote for Bernie Sanders and then this gave Comrade Net Ben-Yahushua the incentive to say what he actually thought about Bernie Sanders, it is just as complicated as we suspected. I wish everyone would stop getting scared of abraham Weizfeld's proposals to support Bernie Sanders, that is what the Chairman of the Revolution is suppose to do, he is suppose to encourage the legal strategies in what ever way he finds to be credible. So if we find that a Bernie Sanders presidency would kill Revolutionary spirit and Dr. Weizfeld does not understand why, just remember that all we have to do is translate what Dr. Weizfeld says into a material aim in a way that does not contradict our logic. Obviously this means that we need to gain control over the Jewish left in America make sure that it is us who puts the questions to Bernie Sanders publicly on record. We need to get to work on these questions, we also need to pressure Democrats to denounce the Right-Wing populist notions of Gun Control, if this pressure is ineffective we move on. We most likely will move on anyway, but let me remind everyone that while we all promote Eco-Socialism it was Dr. Weizfeld who actually campaigned for Eco-Socialism in Quebec, anyone who fails to realize how revolutionary Dr. abraham Weizfeld truly is, proves to be ignorant of the struggle.   

White Nationalism is on the rise and the Christchurch mosque shootings were indeed terrorist attacks at mosques. This took place in Christchurch, New Zealand, during Friday Prayer on March 15, 2019. We need to stop talking about nonviolence and Gun Control, the State is undemocratic and we speak for our selves and must get armed, the Police are White supremacists and any talk of Gun Control or nonviolence will end in anew Holocaust, just keeping this real.

Free the Jewish Proletariat from Zionist neocolonial exportation and Americanist assimilation via western christian supremacy.

Wherever we are, that is our homeland, we are from here.

Hereness not Elsewhereness.

Free the Diaspora with Proletarian Doikeit.


By Isaiah P. Kamatstein